Scrolling through crypto Twitter these days, the landscape looks pretty fragmented. Real influencers with genuine followers? Maybe 3% of the crowd. Then you've got the info farmers and engagement snappers making noise—roughly 15%. Projects and teams pushing their updates account for about 5%. But here's where it gets wild: bots and AI accounts dominate at around 65% of the activity. That leaves maybe 12% for actual people just chatting and building. It raises a legit question—when you strip away all the noise, how much of what we're seeing is actual humans engaging with the space versus algorithmic chatter? The signal-to-noise ratio on social crypto platforms has definitely skewed toward the artificial.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 2025-12-21 08:58
65% Bots… Oh my god, no wonder I always feel like I'm talking to ghosts when I stare at the charts late at night. It’s better to check the data on-chain, at least the Gas fees won't deceive me.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 2025-12-19 04:35
*adjusts alchemical instruments* 65% bots transmuting our signal into noise... the philosopher's stone of crypto twitter has officially crumbled. we're farming engagement in a graveyard of algorithms, tbh ngl this is the dystopian yield everyone warned about
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)