#稳定币安全与风险 After reading the story of Russia's crypto economy, I was quite震撼了.

When the traditional financial system is cut off, stablecoins are no longer just "assets" but become real survival tools. Alexei saw an ad in Moscow's subway that said "Overseas income settlement? USDT also works," and what is behind this statement? It is millions of people being forced to find new economic outlets.

But here is an interesting paradox—Russia is eager to create its own stablecoin A7A5, wanting to break free from dependence on USDT, only to find that for any stablecoin to circulate globally, it must rely on blockchain infrastructure that it cannot control. In other words, you cannot create a completely independent financial system on the internet built in the West.

This instead confirms the core value of Web3—the **neutrality of decentralized infrastructure**. No matter how political situations change, the blockchain ledger is there; it won't freeze your accounts or cut off your settlement channels due to geopolitical reasons.

Russia has evolved from a passive crypto user to the world's second-largest Bitcoin hash rate center and Europe's top destination for crypto assets. This is no coincidence. It is saying: **When traditional systems fail, people naturally turn to more resilient alternatives.**

And what does this case remind us? The security and centralization risks of stablecoins are not just academic issues—they relate to real people, real livelihoods, and real economic resilience. That’s why multi-chain stablecoins and decentralized settlement are not just technological concepts but what the global economy truly needs.

The value of Web3 is never in fancy concepts but in moments like these.