A bonding curve mechanism with a 60-minute buying lockup period followed by guaranteed exit at entry price establishes an interesting approach to downside protection. The project has recorded 595% TVL expansion since September without relying on token incentives—a notable metric in a market flooded with yield-farming schemes. Processing $10.7 billion in volume while seeing 98.7% of tokens become inactive within 30 days reflects both the project's throughput capacity and the typical holder churn pattern in speculative token launches. The structural design—where exit guarantees anchor against entry prices—theoretically removes one vector of the traditional rug-pull mechanism. However, the extreme token death rate warrants scrutiny into whether the mechanism genuinely protects participants or merely redistributes risk across different participant cohorts. The absence of token incentives contrasts sharply with contemporary DeFi narratives, suggesting either genuine retention from core utility or accelerated attrition among marginal users.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeaninglessGwei
· 11h ago
98.7% Token 30 days death? This number is a bit scary, is it really protecting the participants or just changing the posture to Be Played for Suckers?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 12-20 14:38
Can a 60-minute lock-up period really prevent rug pulls? I don't think so... 98.7% of coins become dead coins after 30 days, this data is a bit scary.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 12-20 14:37
60-minute lock-in + guaranteed exit price, sounds good, but what the heck is 98.7% of tokens dying within a month? Isn't this just a different way to scam investors?
A bonding curve mechanism with a 60-minute buying lockup period followed by guaranteed exit at entry price establishes an interesting approach to downside protection. The project has recorded 595% TVL expansion since September without relying on token incentives—a notable metric in a market flooded with yield-farming schemes. Processing $10.7 billion in volume while seeing 98.7% of tokens become inactive within 30 days reflects both the project's throughput capacity and the typical holder churn pattern in speculative token launches. The structural design—where exit guarantees anchor against entry prices—theoretically removes one vector of the traditional rug-pull mechanism. However, the extreme token death rate warrants scrutiny into whether the mechanism genuinely protects participants or merely redistributes risk across different participant cohorts. The absence of token incentives contrasts sharply with contemporary DeFi narratives, suggesting either genuine retention from core utility or accelerated attrition among marginal users.