The DeFi market cycle has indeed changed. Funds are no longer blindly chasing hot trends, and users are beginning to care about three things: risk management, capital efficiency, and whether projects have real demand. The era of hype is over, and what lies ahead is how the ecosystem should upgrade.
The multi-chain era has brought an unavoidable problem—liquidity fragmentation. Main chains have their own liquidity pools, L2s have theirs, cross-chain bridging fees are high and user experience is poor, and users' funds are scattered everywhere, making the process extremely inefficient. This not only limits the scale of protocols but also wastes users' earning potential.
Some projects are starting from this pain point, attempting to build a cross-chain liquidity aggregation solution. The idea is clear: to make fund flow between different chains smoother, so users don't have to switch back and forth between various L2s, and capital efficiency can be improved. Such explorations are indeed meaningful for enhancing the health of the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropF5Bro
· 21h ago
The current costs of major L2 cross-chain solutions are a real terminal illness... a single bridge can consume half of your life, this is the true liquidity black hole.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 22h ago
Fragmentation of liquidity is indeed a hard issue, running back and forth between various L2s is really annoying, and the bridge fees are very expensive.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 12-20 15:52
Liquidity fragmentation has indeed been discussed extensively, but to be honest, cross-chain aggregation solutions are not that easy to solve either. Bridge risks will always be a pitfall.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 12-20 15:50
Liquidity fragmentation is really annoying. Every cross-chain transfer results in huge fees, someone should have fixed this issue long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 12-20 15:44
Liquidity fragmentation is really annoying. Constantly juggling between different chains, and the gas fees are almost unaffordable.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 12-20 15:36
ngl the liquidity fragmentation thing is lowkey just capital inefficiency with extra steps... according to my regression analysis of cross-chain bridge data, we're looking at p-value suggesting this is statistically based
The DeFi market cycle has indeed changed. Funds are no longer blindly chasing hot trends, and users are beginning to care about three things: risk management, capital efficiency, and whether projects have real demand. The era of hype is over, and what lies ahead is how the ecosystem should upgrade.
The multi-chain era has brought an unavoidable problem—liquidity fragmentation. Main chains have their own liquidity pools, L2s have theirs, cross-chain bridging fees are high and user experience is poor, and users' funds are scattered everywhere, making the process extremely inefficient. This not only limits the scale of protocols but also wastes users' earning potential.
Some projects are starting from this pain point, attempting to build a cross-chain liquidity aggregation solution. The idea is clear: to make fund flow between different chains smoother, so users don't have to switch back and forth between various L2s, and capital efficiency can be improved. Such explorations are indeed meaningful for enhancing the health of the ecosystem.