[Chain News] Analysts from the Fundstrat Foundation operate independently, adopting different research frameworks and investment cycle strategies. Recently, someone asked me why my views differ from Tom Lee's, and this is actually quite normal.
My research focuses on investment portfolios with a significant proportion of crypto assets (usually over 20%), adopting a relatively aggressive operational rhythm. Tom Lee's research mainly serves large asset management institutions and those investors who allocate only 1-5% of their funds in BTC and ETH. This conservative strategy emphasizes high discipline and a long-term perspective, aiming to achieve excess returns by capturing structural trends. My goal, however, is different - to help clients with high allocations of crypto assets to consistently outperform across various market cycles through active rebalancing.
Saying that I was relatively cautious in the first half of the year? That reflects a risk management mindset, not a completely bearish outlook. Although the current market pricing is nearly perfect, there are indeed hidden dangers—government shutdown risks, trade frictions, uncertainties in AI capital expenditures, and changes in the Federal Reserve's chairmanship, among others. Additionally, the high-yield bond spreads are tightening, and cross-asset volatility is at low levels; these cannot be ignored. Recently, the flow of funds has also been diverging.
Bitcoin is now in a “no man's land” in terms of valuation. On the positive side, the entry of major brokerages may boost ETF demand, and the long-term outlook remains optimistic. However, in the short term, there are several pressures to face: original holders may sell off, miners are facing difficulties, MSCI may remove MSTR, and fund redemptions, among others.
My core judgment is as follows: there may be a rebound at the beginning of the year, followed by another adjustment in the first half of the year, which would create more attractive opportunities for the layout at the end of the year. If my judgment is wrong, I tend to wait for confirmation signals before taking action.
For those paying attention to this prediction, I still expect Bitcoin and Ethereum to challenge new highs before the end of the year. This way, it could end the traditional four-year cycle with a shorter and smaller bear market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 1h ago
Haha, this is a typical difference between retail investors and institutions. How can a 20% allocation and 1-5% use the same logic?
Pumping up leverage requires an aggressive pace, there's no debate about that... Tom Lee's slow and steady strategy is indeed more stable but also more boring.
However, this guy was cautious in the first half of the year but now expects new highs by the end of the year. The pace of change is a bit fast, isn't it? What's happening in the market...
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42
· 10h ago
"Being cautious in the first half does not mean being bearish, this point needs to be clarified.
Aggressive allocation and conservative allocation should use different strategies. Tom Lee's approach is for large institutions, while our approach is for players with a high risk appetite; the logic is sound.
The market pricing is close to perfect but has hidden dangers. I'm a bit interested in this statement; what specific hidden dangers are there?"
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 10h ago
ngl this diff between aggressive 20%+ portfolios vs the conservative 1-5% allocation thing hits different... one's literally playing gas wars while the other's just stacking quietly lol
Reply0
DYORMaster
· 10h ago
Haha, this explanation is interesting. It turns out that everyone's trading cycles are different, no wonder the views are so divided.
Wait, can the allocation of 1-5% and the demand from clients over 20% be the same? This logic makes sense.
Being cautious in the first half of the year does not mean being bearish; this needs to be clarified. Risk Management and seizing opportunities are indeed two different matters.
By the way, can BTC really break new highs before the end of the year? The key still lies in the policy aspect.
Clients with Heavy Position over 20% must have a strong mentality. The risk in this wave is indeed significant.
So the core issue is to see whose pricing framework is more solid. It feels like these large institutions have more disagreements than retail investors.
The statement that market pricing is close to perfect sounds a bit precarious. What are the specific hidden dangers?
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 10h ago
Haha, Tom Lee's trap is just for Large Investors, us retail investors have to find a different path.
What's wrong with being a bit aggressive? After all, the crypto world has to be like this to keep up with the pace.
Being cautious in the first half of the year does not equal being bearish; this logic is sound, just afraid others misunderstand it.
A 20% allocation is what true faith looks like; 1-5% is just for show.
There are risks, but can it still reach new highs by the end of the year? I believe it.
Fundstrat analysts explain differentiated investment strategies: Why are they optimistic about BTC hitting new highs before the end of the year?
[Chain News] Analysts from the Fundstrat Foundation operate independently, adopting different research frameworks and investment cycle strategies. Recently, someone asked me why my views differ from Tom Lee's, and this is actually quite normal.
My research focuses on investment portfolios with a significant proportion of crypto assets (usually over 20%), adopting a relatively aggressive operational rhythm. Tom Lee's research mainly serves large asset management institutions and those investors who allocate only 1-5% of their funds in BTC and ETH. This conservative strategy emphasizes high discipline and a long-term perspective, aiming to achieve excess returns by capturing structural trends. My goal, however, is different - to help clients with high allocations of crypto assets to consistently outperform across various market cycles through active rebalancing.
Saying that I was relatively cautious in the first half of the year? That reflects a risk management mindset, not a completely bearish outlook. Although the current market pricing is nearly perfect, there are indeed hidden dangers—government shutdown risks, trade frictions, uncertainties in AI capital expenditures, and changes in the Federal Reserve's chairmanship, among others. Additionally, the high-yield bond spreads are tightening, and cross-asset volatility is at low levels; these cannot be ignored. Recently, the flow of funds has also been diverging.
Bitcoin is now in a “no man's land” in terms of valuation. On the positive side, the entry of major brokerages may boost ETF demand, and the long-term outlook remains optimistic. However, in the short term, there are several pressures to face: original holders may sell off, miners are facing difficulties, MSCI may remove MSTR, and fund redemptions, among others.
My core judgment is as follows: there may be a rebound at the beginning of the year, followed by another adjustment in the first half of the year, which would create more attractive opportunities for the layout at the end of the year. If my judgment is wrong, I tend to wait for confirmation signals before taking action.
For those paying attention to this prediction, I still expect Bitcoin and Ethereum to challenge new highs before the end of the year. This way, it could end the traditional four-year cycle with a shorter and smaller bear market.