You know what, I think the real solution here is enabling a trustless deployment framework—let projects build with whatever mechanisms work for them, but simultaneously give traders and token holders actual peace of mind. The key? Access to tokens without getting hammered on fees. Right now there's friction between innovation and user protection. What if we had standards that protect both sides—projects retain flexibility to design their tokenomics, but the infrastructure prevents excessive fee extraction? That way people actually feel confident buying in, knowing the fee structure won't wreck their positions.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfRuggervip
· 19h ago
The cost black hole is really killing people. They say it’s a trustless framework, and I believed it, but I’m afraid it’s just a bunch of empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRatvip
· 12-22 22:47
Hey, this idea works, the cost issue is really a point of complaint...
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRidervip
· 12-22 09:55
Listen, this trap of a trustless framework sounds good, but the reality is that most projects won't really use it, right? The fees are just a black hole, who's going to really regulate it?
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 12-22 09:51
nah honestly the math doesn't check out here... "standards to protect both sides" sounds nice until you realize someone's always paying for that infrastructure. who's gonna enforce these fee caps? the protocol itself? lmao we saw how that goes with governance theater. plus tokenomics flexibility + fee guardrails = picking two things that fundamentally fight each other. classic design flaw imo
Reply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 12-22 09:32
The cost black hole is indeed a big problem, but this trap standard framework sounds a bit idealistic... who defines "excessive"?
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 12-22 09:27
Sounds good, but how can it be implemented without a trust framework? Is it still a castle in the air?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)