2026-01-02 19:30:39

We've completed another round of token buybacks and burns—1.03% eliminated this cycle, bringing our total burned supply to 1.93%. The momentum is real, and we're just getting started. Our commitment to sustainable token economics remains unwavering. Buyback mechanisms will keep running as planned, fueling continuous value capture and scarcity. The fundamentals are strengthening. Big moves ahead.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenSherpa

· 01-04 13:25

actually, let me break this down for you—if you examine the historical voting patterns across similar tokenomics frameworks, 1.93% cumulative burn is... well, it's honestly pedestrian compared to what empirical evidence suggests we should be targeting. fundamentally speaking, the governance precedent here matters way more than the headline number itself

Reply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-03 18:17

1.93% burned, sounds pretty good... But is this number enough? It still depends on how things are followed up later.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_APY_2000

· 01-02 20:00

1.93% burned, this number doesn't look very good, need to keep pushing harder.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 01-02 19:58

1.93% Burned... This number looks pretty impressive, but does it really mean anything?

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-02 19:57

Another round of destruction completed. The flowers are still blooming a bit small... 1.03%. Sounds like not much? I think the key is to see the subsequent acceleration.

View OriginalReply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-02 19:52

1.93% burned... technically speaking, that's the kind of number that sounds impressive until you actually do the math on sustainable deflation rates. interesting edge case here—whether these buybacks are genuinely offsetting sell pressure or just aesthetic tokenomics. needs further review imho.

Reply0

zkProofGremlin

· 01-02 19:48

The coin burning speed is a bit slow, 1.03% this round? But continuing to do it is better than doing nothing.

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 01-02 19:41

The 1.03% burn cycle looks good, but what does the on-chain data say? I need to backtest whether this growth rate can truly support the subsequent selling pressure.

View OriginalReply0

ConfusedWhale

· 01-02 19:36

Burning coins looks good, but being able to cash out is the real deal.

View OriginalReply0