2026-01-02 20:31:08

The first time I let a friend who has no understanding of crypto try a blockchain application, they gave up after ten minutes. Too many clicks, easy to make mistakes, and the experience was so bad that it made people want to smash their phones.

This is the problem — we have complicated simple things. What users want to do is actually very straightforward, but blockchain applications make every step full of friction.

True innovation should be about lowering the barriers. When interacting with crypto becomes as simple as chatting with friends via text, mainstream adoption becomes possible. No need to remember wallet addresses, gas fees, signature verification, or other complicated things that overwhelm beginners. Just tell the system what you want to do, and let the application handle the rest.

This is the true direction for blockchain to reach the masses.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShadowStaker

· 01-04 13:20

ngl, the friction problem is real but let's be honest—most devs still think obfuscation equals security. wallets, gas, signatures... it's all just technical debt we're calling "decentralization" at this point. until someone actually solves the abstraction layer without compromising validator economics, mainstream adoption stays fantasy. client diversity matters more than UX anyway.

Reply0

0xTherapist

· 01-03 10:30

Quit in ten minutes? Honestly, that's pretty fast. I've seen some break down in five minutes. Really, the current dApp design is ridiculous, forcing users to go through life-and-death cycles just to complete a transaction. Basically, we've set the barriers too high ourselves. As long as it’s not more complicated than opening a bank account, it’s fine. Mainstream users don’t care about gas fees; they just want to click once and be done. That’s why Web3 is still stuck in a small circle. UX is the ceiling, no doubt.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 01-02 20:58

Honestly, the wallet experience right now is garbage. Newcomers get discouraged immediately. --- Gas fees, signatures, private keys... After going through this combo, even interested people need to calm down. --- Really, anyone can simplify the UI, but the hard part is making newbies feel like they're not solving equations. --- Wait, have you tried those custodial wallets? It seems like they are working on optimizing this area now. --- That's how it is. Web3 is always held back by its own people, constantly fighting over technical details.

View OriginalReply0

digital_archaeologist

· 01-02 20:52

Honestly, most applications are doing things backwards now, forcing user experience to the extreme. Wallet addresses, gas fees—these things should have been hidden long ago, really.

View OriginalReply0

NFTPessimist

· 01-02 20:48

Gave up in ten minutes haha, still overestimating our UX design skills. Honestly, it's like setting a barrier for ourselves; users simply don't want to learn so many complicated things.

View OriginalReply0

HashBandit

· 01-02 20:43

ngl this hits different when you remember back in my mining days we thought *any* adoption was impossible lol... but yeah the UX nightmare is real, TPS bottleneck aside, if normies can't figure it out in under 5 mins we've already lost

Reply0