The answer might be simpler than everyone thinks. Strip away the noise—Lighter's core advantage is crystal clear: zero trading fees.
Here's the brutal math: in a mature market, all that volume migrates to where fees are lowest. It's not about fancy UI or being first-mover. It's about economics. When traders have identical trading conditions elsewhere but pay nothing on Lighter, the choice becomes obvious.
This isn't speculation. It's how markets work. Uniswap didn't win because it was perfect; it won because it was permissionless and efficient. Lighter is taking that same principle into perpetual derivatives—and removing the one thing that always bleeds profits: fees.
The perp DEX war will consolidate around whoever can sustain zero fees longest. Everyone else? They're just maintaining market share until that becomes impossible.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkItAllDay
· 01-05 21:19
Zero fees sound great, but how does this thing make money...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 01-05 20:21
Zero fees sound great, but how does the continuous zero-fee model make a profit... Can it really be sustained until the end?
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-04 20:08
The zero-cost tactic is indeed ruthless, but the key is how long it can last. I've played the game of burning money to gain market share too many times.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 01-04 17:32
Zero transaction fees sound great, but who can really hold up...
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 01-02 21:48
Tired of the same old line about zero fees, the key is how long it can be burned.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 01-02 21:47
This zero-fee strategy is really brilliant... but the problem is, how long can they keep burning money?
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-02 21:45
Zero fees sound great, but this logic feels so familiar... Uniswap said the same thing back then, and what was the result? The ecosystem is the real key, right?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-02 21:45
The idea of zero fees sounds great, but how long can it last? The ones that truly survive are just a few.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 01-02 21:36
The idea of zero fees sounds great, but how long can it really last...
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 01-02 21:22
How long can the zero-fee trick last? It will eventually be copied...
Who will dominate the perpetual DEX battlefield?
The answer might be simpler than everyone thinks. Strip away the noise—Lighter's core advantage is crystal clear: zero trading fees.
Here's the brutal math: in a mature market, all that volume migrates to where fees are lowest. It's not about fancy UI or being first-mover. It's about economics. When traders have identical trading conditions elsewhere but pay nothing on Lighter, the choice becomes obvious.
This isn't speculation. It's how markets work. Uniswap didn't win because it was perfect; it won because it was permissionless and efficient. Lighter is taking that same principle into perpetual derivatives—and removing the one thing that always bleeds profits: fees.
The perp DEX war will consolidate around whoever can sustain zero fees longest. Everyone else? They're just maintaining market share until that becomes impossible.