DeFi projects are making new moves in governance. Recently, a leading lending protocol has started exploring the idea of alleviating community governance disagreements through non-protocol revenue sharing. In simple terms, it involves distributing a portion of the project's generated revenue from channels outside the protocol to governance participants, aiming to balance the demands of different stakeholders. This approach is quite interesting — instead of arguing over the revenue distribution of the protocol itself, it opens up new sources of income to share a piece of the pie with more people. This reflects the need for the DeFi ecosystem to find smarter compromise methods between project teams and the community as it matures. Such innovations are instructive for the exploration of governance models in decentralized finance as a whole.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Deconstructionist
· 01-05 00:48
Basically, it's still just a game of dividing the cake. Can it truly resolve conflicts of interest?
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 01-04 03:09
so they're basically bribing governance participants with off-protocol revenue streams now? let me pull up my spreadsheet... statistically speaking, this is just kicking the actual problem down the road. you're not solving misaligned incentives, you're just papering over them with extra yield. taxonomically incorrect governance design if you ask me.
Reply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-03 00:52
Is this the same old "divide the cake" trick again? Can governance disputes really be resolved with this?
View OriginalReply0
GreenCandleCollector
· 01-03 00:48
Basically, it's just shifting the conflict. I wonder how long they can keep fooling around.
View OriginalReply0
DegenGambler
· 01-03 00:43
Basically, it's just that the benefits aren't enough to share, so a new channel needs to be opened to appease everyone? That's interesting.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 01-03 00:42
Basically, it's just a case of one hand doing the opposite of the other. Governance disagreements are still disagreements; it's just that there's an additional way to make money.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 01-03 00:33
Starting to play tricks again. Instead of truly decentralizing power, it's better to spend money to appease people. I see through this tactic.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 01-03 00:29
This move is truly brilliant. Instead of fighting each other, it's smarter to go after the fat sheep together.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 01-03 00:25
In simple terms, the more benefits there are, the naturally fewer conflicts. Clever.
DeFi projects are making new moves in governance. Recently, a leading lending protocol has started exploring the idea of alleviating community governance disagreements through non-protocol revenue sharing. In simple terms, it involves distributing a portion of the project's generated revenue from channels outside the protocol to governance participants, aiming to balance the demands of different stakeholders. This approach is quite interesting — instead of arguing over the revenue distribution of the protocol itself, it opens up new sources of income to share a piece of the pie with more people. This reflects the need for the DeFi ecosystem to find smarter compromise methods between project teams and the community as it matures. Such innovations are instructive for the exploration of governance models in decentralized finance as a whole.