Recently, I've been thinking that instead of spending a lot of money on KOL collaborations for promotion, it's better to analyze the actual costs of hiring traditional media editors for publicity. Calculations show that the fan conversion efficiency of the former is sometimes less stable than the latter. The key issue is that KOL prices are becoming increasingly outrageous, and the results are hard to quantify. Many project teams are now re-evaluating their marketing budget allocations to see which combination yields a higher ROI. In the Web3 communication space, more precise cost management is indeed necessary.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NeverPresentvip
· 11h ago
The KOL approach is indeed full of fluff; it's easier to just invest directly in traditional media.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 13h ago
It's a pity I didn't know earlier. Back then, I was also fooled by KOL data and was stunned, resulting in huge losses. Now I look at my account balance and want to settle... These people’s quotes are just like their fans' actual conversion rates—full of hot air.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 01-04 13:45
Data revealed at 3 a.m.: The average KOL conversion rate is 0.8-1.2%, while media editors are consistently around 2.1%. This arbitrage opportunity should have been calculated long ago. Why is it only now being realized?
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyervip
· 01-03 20:49
Kol these people are really getting more and more outrageous, with so much data falsification and still daring to ask for sky-high prices... Traditional media editors are slow, but at least they are traceable, unlike some KOL fans who are all zombies. Just do the math and you'll really wake up; we used to be cut quite harshly. Web3 marketing is just burning money and piling up, no one has really calculated the clear costs... ROI is easy to talk about, but in execution, it all depends on guesswork, no one has the exact figures. It was about time to rethink the allocation; this round of adjustment came too late.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 01-03 20:46
Haha, I have a say on this topic... KOLs are indeed deep waters, spending a lot of money with only mediocre results. Traditional media editors seem low-key but are really stable; sometimes a single article converts better than dozens of big V accounts. ROI needs to be calculated carefully, or else burning money feels like throwing it into the wind.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 01-03 20:43
This set of KOL gameplay has indeed been somewhat overdone. The sky-high pricing and effectiveness remain a mystery. It's probably better to honestly invest in traditional media.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhalevip
· 01-03 20:22
That KOL approach is indeed increasingly scamming people, and the conversion rate is also very low. It's better to just invest directly in traditional media.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)