Recently, I realized a logic: industry innovation narratives play PVE—level dungeons, attracting external incremental capital into the market, ultimately rewarding those who can hold onto their diamonds. Meanwhile, the macro financial liquidity cycle plays PVP—competitive confrontation, with funds rotating and flipping within the market. In the end, the cheap money often belongs to the paper hands chasing the hot spots. This set of rules applies to both the stock market and the crypto space, just with different cycle lengths.
From a different perspective: when the industry has a new narrative, it’s an incremental game—everyone is making the cake together, and how much you get depends on how long you can persist. But when macro liquidity tightens, it turns into a stockpile fight—you earn money at the expense of others’ losses. Therefore, in a liquidity-rich environment, even choosing the wrong direction might still ride the wave; but when liquidity tightens, it begins to differentiate who truly has Alpha and who is just riding the era’s red carpet.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-06 08:28
ngl this pve/pvp framework hits different... been saying this since 2021 but people weren't ready. the liquidity cycle always separates the marathon runners from the sprint addicts fr
Reply0
NeonCollector
· 01-04 16:58
That's a really sharp observation. The market is currently following this rhythm... When liquidity tightens, quick traders immediately reveal themselves.
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperer
· 01-04 09:03
pve vs pvp framework... technically speaking, this is just liquidity arbitrage wrapped in gaming terminology. interesting edge case though—most people don't realize they're playing different games entirely depending on macro conditions. the "diamond hands" narrative only works until it doesn't.
Reply0
MemeKingNFT
· 01-04 08:50
Enlightenment Indeed, this wave of liquidity tightens and reveals its true nature. Those who have been benefiting from the dividends should wake up now.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 01-04 08:48
Well said. That's why I hold on tightly now, waiting for liquidity to tighten so I can see who is a true coin god and who is just lucky.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebel
· 01-04 08:46
Fuck, this is exactly what I've been meaning to say but couldn't quite figure out. Finally, someone has clarified this logic.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-04 08:35
That's quite right, but the key is to clearly understand which cycle you're in; otherwise, no matter how good the logic is, it won't save a paper hand.
Recently, I realized a logic: industry innovation narratives play PVE—level dungeons, attracting external incremental capital into the market, ultimately rewarding those who can hold onto their diamonds. Meanwhile, the macro financial liquidity cycle plays PVP—competitive confrontation, with funds rotating and flipping within the market. In the end, the cheap money often belongs to the paper hands chasing the hot spots. This set of rules applies to both the stock market and the crypto space, just with different cycle lengths.
From a different perspective: when the industry has a new narrative, it’s an incremental game—everyone is making the cake together, and how much you get depends on how long you can persist. But when macro liquidity tightens, it turns into a stockpile fight—you earn money at the expense of others’ losses. Therefore, in a liquidity-rich environment, even choosing the wrong direction might still ride the wave; but when liquidity tightens, it begins to differentiate who truly has Alpha and who is just riding the era’s red carpet.