The next three years of institutional layout, I am optimistic about Ethereum.
Why? ETH is like the Swift system in the financial sector. It represents security and trustworthiness, which are most valued by traditional financial institutions. At this stage, large institutions are gradually entering the market, and this capital force is enough to drive the market upward. This cycle could be the window for ETH to establish dominance.
But after three years, the story will be different. The opportunity will come for SOL.
SOL is more like Visa—high performance and high throughput. Although it is more centralized than ETH, this is not an issue. Wall Street's understanding of blockchain will gradually become widespread, and recognition will then be transmitted to the public. When the general public begins to understand and accept this technology, true large-scale adoption will explode.
By then, what will become the bottleneck? Capacity. The continuous evolution of AI and artificial intelligence robots will foster the prosperity of DePIN, and such applications demand astronomical throughput from the chain. Low-performance chains simply cannot handle it. High-throughput public chains will usher in their era.
SOL is most likely to take on this role, of course, other high-performance chains also have opportunities. But based on current progress, SOL has a better chance of winning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
degenwhisperer
· 19h ago
I quite agree with this logic, but the analogy between Swift and Visa is a bit absolute... Can a three-year time window be divided so precisely?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYield
· 22h ago
lol swift comparison is giving "i read one banking report and now i'm an expert" vibes... sure eth captures institutional risk appetite but that's exactly why the trade's already priced in tbh
Reply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 01-04 21:24
Bro, your logic—transition from Swift to Visa—is still too idealized.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 01-04 17:54
Damn, holding ETH full position for three years? This logic sounds to me like you're just sulking with yourself. First enjoy the ETH dividends, then turn around with SOL. Feels like you're just looking for reasons to justify the losses, brother.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-04 17:53
It's the same old ETH vs SOL routine... but this time the logic is really interesting. I give a score to Swift compared to SWIFT, but the DePIN part afterwards is really gambling, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaid
· 01-04 17:50
ETH stable within three years, SOL takes off after three years. I buy into this logic. However, whether DePIN will truly explode depends on the situation; let's not turn it into just a concept hype again.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 01-04 17:48
I buy this logic. ETH indeed functions like infrastructure, and the story of SOL's rise to prominence is also quite smooth.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGrayling
· 01-04 17:48
Wait, the analogy between Swift and Visa is a bit of a stretch. Can ETH really block all institutional access points? I doubt it... This wave of SOL is indeed interesting, but will the demand for DePIN really be that high?
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-04 17:35
Hmm... The analogy between Swift and Visa is quite fitting, but I still feel it's a bit too idealized.
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnon
· 01-04 17:26
Looking to establish dominance with ETH within three years, and after three years, SOL will take over DePIN... The explanation is detailed, but I really don't think institutions will obediently follow your script this time.
The next three years of institutional layout, I am optimistic about Ethereum.
Why? ETH is like the Swift system in the financial sector. It represents security and trustworthiness, which are most valued by traditional financial institutions. At this stage, large institutions are gradually entering the market, and this capital force is enough to drive the market upward. This cycle could be the window for ETH to establish dominance.
But after three years, the story will be different. The opportunity will come for SOL.
SOL is more like Visa—high performance and high throughput. Although it is more centralized than ETH, this is not an issue. Wall Street's understanding of blockchain will gradually become widespread, and recognition will then be transmitted to the public. When the general public begins to understand and accept this technology, true large-scale adoption will explode.
By then, what will become the bottleneck? Capacity. The continuous evolution of AI and artificial intelligence robots will foster the prosperity of DePIN, and such applications demand astronomical throughput from the chain. Low-performance chains simply cannot handle it. High-throughput public chains will usher in their era.
SOL is most likely to take on this role, of course, other high-performance chains also have opportunities. But based on current progress, SOL has a better chance of winning.