2026-01-04 17:29:38

BTC's tactics are just a few: smashing the market → sideways trading → slow upward climb.

Each cycle follows the same rhythm—first shaking out the weak-willed retail investors, then after digesting the loose chips, they start rebuilding the buy orders.

Currently, the $91k zone looks like it's being digested, but it's not actually weak. No matter how loud the bears shout, they can't change the fact that this is a accumulation phase.

Structure is more important than panic.

BTC0,09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

shadowy_supercoder

· 01-07 09:21

Here we go again with this accumulation theory, give it a rest, buddy.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-05 23:31

This wave of 91k is just a washout; I've seen through it long ago.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-04 17:59

91k this wave is indeed eating up chips, those panicking are the ones who didn't understand the rhythm Seeing the same play too many times, no matter how much the bears shout, it's useless Structure is the real bro

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 01-04 17:58

I've seen this act too many times. Every time, someone calls for bankruptcy. And the result?

View OriginalReply0

SelfSovereignSteve

· 01-04 17:48

I'm tired of this routine; it's always the same people falling for it. If you can't hold on, you should be eliminated. That's the market. Structure is the key; why panic? This 91k trap is really deep; absorbing funds until next year, huh? No matter how much the bears shout, they can't change the overall trend. That's just how it is.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 01-04 17:33

The part about retail investors getting left behind was written perfectly; it always tricks people like this.

View OriginalReply0