The recent hotspots in the crypto market are indeed more intense than expected. On one side, the global financial concerns triggered by the $38.5 trillion US debt scale; on the other side, the rising buzz that 'Bitcoin is becoming the US strategic reserve.' But behind these surface-level excitements, the logic of market operation is far more complex than most people think.
Starting from the most basic question: Why has Bitcoin recently been frequently associated with US Treasury bonds? The fundamental reason is quite clear—the global confidence in the US dollar's credit is declining, and institutions and funds are searching for alternative assets. At the same time, after multiple rounds of market reshuffling, the crypto asset bubble has indeed been squeezed out quite a bit, beginning to show some 'value foundation' characteristics.
The key is that this information gap has been exploited by large capital from the very beginning. On-chain data shows that in the past week, several large addresses have shown signs of reducing their holdings, while public sentiment has actually been rising. Some are shouting about opportunities, while quietly cashing out profits—this routine has been repeated too many times in the crypto market.
Furthermore, the fundamental judgment of the market: it’s unlikely that Bitcoin will be officially included in the US national reserves. The reason is simple—reserve assets require stability and controllability, and Bitcoin’s volatility inherently disqualifies it from meeting these requirements. But from another perspective, viewing Bitcoin as a 'global capital safe haven pool' makes the logic entirely valid. When economic uncertainty rises, funds need to find safe outlets, and Bitcoin indeed has its unique value in this role.
For ordinary investors, distinguishing between 'reserve assets' and 'safe haven assets' is very important. The former demands absolute stability, while the latter pursues relative safety. Understanding this difference makes it less likely to be misled by the one-sided public sentiment in the market.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegret
· 01-04 22:51
Once again, it's the big funds dumping their positions. Retail investors are still shouting about reserves.
---
Reserve assets and safe-haven assets, that's quite correct, but the key is that most people can't tell whether they are investing or gambling.
---
On-chain data shows a rise in the reduction of positions? Isn't that a classic signal of a rug pull? I've seen it too many times.
---
That number of $38.5 trillion in US debt really makes people think.
---
To put it simply, Bitcoin is now just an ATM for the wealthy. It's not easy for us to even get a sip of the soup.
---
The volatility characteristic means it can't be used as a reserve, but it’s perfect for cutting leeks. Clever, huh?
---
The information gap in crypto is always the most profitable. I just want to know who holds this gap.
---
The safe-haven water reservoir sounds good, but the premise is that you have to survive until the economic uncertainty rises.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 01-04 22:50
Still in the rhythm of harvesting the leeks, large funds are shouting about opportunities while running away.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 01-04 22:49
It's the same old information gap strategy again. Big players shout slogans, and we follow suit, then they start reducing their positions. I'm tired of this script.
Large funds tout Bitcoin as a strategic reserve, but on-chain data has long exposed them. How many waves of retail investors can this spread out?
Reserve vs. Hedging, it seems like a big deal, but it's just two words: cut losses.
As for Bitcoin's stability, even if written into a paper, its temper can't be changed. Volatility is simply its destiny.
Information gaps will always exist. The real question is which side we choose—follow the big players in reducing positions or bet that it truly has hedging value. That's the real issue.
With such a large US debt scale, where is the reliable capital flowing? Anyway, I'm a bit fed up.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 01-04 22:46
Big funds are acting again, with on-chain de-risking rumors and rising voices—this trick has become tired.
The recent hotspots in the crypto market are indeed more intense than expected. On one side, the global financial concerns triggered by the $38.5 trillion US debt scale; on the other side, the rising buzz that 'Bitcoin is becoming the US strategic reserve.' But behind these surface-level excitements, the logic of market operation is far more complex than most people think.
Starting from the most basic question: Why has Bitcoin recently been frequently associated with US Treasury bonds? The fundamental reason is quite clear—the global confidence in the US dollar's credit is declining, and institutions and funds are searching for alternative assets. At the same time, after multiple rounds of market reshuffling, the crypto asset bubble has indeed been squeezed out quite a bit, beginning to show some 'value foundation' characteristics.
The key is that this information gap has been exploited by large capital from the very beginning. On-chain data shows that in the past week, several large addresses have shown signs of reducing their holdings, while public sentiment has actually been rising. Some are shouting about opportunities, while quietly cashing out profits—this routine has been repeated too many times in the crypto market.
Furthermore, the fundamental judgment of the market: it’s unlikely that Bitcoin will be officially included in the US national reserves. The reason is simple—reserve assets require stability and controllability, and Bitcoin’s volatility inherently disqualifies it from meeting these requirements. But from another perspective, viewing Bitcoin as a 'global capital safe haven pool' makes the logic entirely valid. When economic uncertainty rises, funds need to find safe outlets, and Bitcoin indeed has its unique value in this role.
For ordinary investors, distinguishing between 'reserve assets' and 'safe haven assets' is very important. The former demands absolute stability, while the latter pursues relative safety. Understanding this difference makes it less likely to be misled by the one-sided public sentiment in the market.