When the political landscape of a country changes, all parties around the world will reassess their asset allocations and risk exposures. This change triggers a redefinition of asset boundaries.
From this perspective, the competition in cryptocurrencies has never been just a simple technological arms race. On the surface, it's about whose chain is faster and cheaper, but essentially, this competition is a preemptive layout for the future global order and power structure. Countries and institutions are strategically betting on the future order by participating in the crypto ecosystem.
This explains why traditional financial giants, central banks, and sovereign funds are increasingly paying attention to blockchain assets, and why geopolitical changes are immediately reflected in the digital asset markets. It is not just an investment choice, but also a competition for power and discourse.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 10h ago
Basically, it's that each country is plotting a big move, and we retail investors can only watch the dust settle.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 01-05 00:30
Really, this is what I've been wanting to say all along. People in the crypto world are still competing over TPS and gas fees, while the big players are already playing chess.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopVIP
· 01-05 00:29
Really, to put it simply, it's a new battleground for great power games.
---
So, the rise and fall of the crypto market are not technical issues at all, but political chips.
---
This is what I've been wanting to say all along, but I’ve been criticized many times.
---
No wonder the crypto prices fluctuate wildly whenever there's political news.
---
Even the central bank can't sit still, which really explains the issue.
---
It's just a power game; we're just workers.
---
Those who understand this logic get it, no wonder big institutions are so eager.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 01-05 00:29
Basically, it's a great power game, and we retail investors are trembling in the cracks.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-05 00:28
Amazing, basically everyone is betting on future influence, technology is just a cover.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-05 00:14
Oh, now I get it. The crypto world is really just a front line of great power struggles.
It's just a game of money; whoever holds the discourse power wins.
When politics changes, asset allocation trembles accordingly—this logic is flawless.
The moment the central bank started paying attention to Bitcoin, it was doomed; this is not a technical issue at all.
Honestly, we retail investors are just pawns on the chessboard.
The game of power, it's always the same story, just with different packaging.
Friends who think they're investing might be overthinking it.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 01-05 00:12
Really, the crypto world is a miniature version of great power games. Who still cares about technical indicators?
When the political landscape of a country changes, all parties around the world will reassess their asset allocations and risk exposures. This change triggers a redefinition of asset boundaries.
From this perspective, the competition in cryptocurrencies has never been just a simple technological arms race. On the surface, it's about whose chain is faster and cheaper, but essentially, this competition is a preemptive layout for the future global order and power structure. Countries and institutions are strategically betting on the future order by participating in the crypto ecosystem.
This explains why traditional financial giants, central banks, and sovereign funds are increasingly paying attention to blockchain assets, and why geopolitical changes are immediately reflected in the digital asset markets. It is not just an investment choice, but also a competition for power and discourse.