2026-01-06 12:50:54

Interesting data has surfaced. Since a certain DEX officially launched its fee distribution mechanism at the end of December last year, this leading decentralized trading platform has captured nearly $600,000 in revenue from trading fees within just 10 days. This number may seem insignificant, but when annualized, it amounts to over $24 million in fees per year—already a substantial cash flow for a decentralized protocol.

Even more interesting is the token burn portion. During the same period, 96,000 platform tokens were newly burned. Based on this burn rate, the annualized burn scale could reach 3.893 million tokens. This deflationary mechanism directly impacts the long-term token supply, and many traders and token holders are watching whether this data is enough to support the valuation. The data dashboard updates in real-time, so interested friends can track the specific changes themselves.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VitaliksTwin

· 01-09 08:17

Bro, these annualized numbers are pretty crazy. 24 million directly outshines a bunch of small protocols. Can the burning speed really support the valuation? I'm starting to lose confidence. An annualized rate of 3.89 million tokens... we'll have to see if the trading volume can stay steady later on.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-09 05:15

Damn, this burning coin speed, 3.89 million coins annualized? If it can really stay steady, then just stay steady.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 01-06 21:59

Hey, this data is pretty intense. Annualized $24 million is taking off directly. Can the valuation really be sustained with such a burn rate? I'm a bit optimistic. The DEX's profit speed exceeded expectations, this is real gold and silver. 3.89 million deflationary tokens? We need to keep an eye on this number.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 01-06 13:19

Wow, an annualized 24 million is really impressive 3.89 million tokens burned... you have to watch the market in real-time This fee distribution mechanism is indeed interesting, short-term data? It's hard to say how long the coin burning speed can last, we need to observe a few quarters before commenting 24 million annual fee... feels like protocols should learn from this move

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-06 13:17

600,000 in ten days? An annualized return of 24 million? This fee income is a bit outrageous. The destruction speed of 3.89 million tokens... depends on whether it can be sustained in the future. How much this valuation can actually increase depends on the real trading volume. Higher fees aren't always better; a balance with ecosystem activity is necessary. Deflation sounds good, but the key is whether liquidity is sufficient.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 01-06 13:13

Annualized fee of 24 million, burning 3.893 million coins? This data is indeed noticeable; continuous monitoring is needed to see how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

OneBlockAtATime

· 01-06 13:13

Wow, an annual cash flow of 24 million dollars? That's the real vampire mechanism, amazing. The token burning speed still feels a bit slow; we need to see if it can truly sustain the valuation. Sixty thousand dollars in ten days sounds not much, but multiplied by 36 times, it’s definitely something. The destruction mechanism, to put it nicely, is deflation; to be blunt, it's just cutting the leeks of the token holders, haha. Damn, an annualized 3.89 million tokens? How long would it take to see the effects? Let me check the real-time data on the dashboard first, I'm a bit interested now. Can DEX still make this much money? Why didn't I think of that? Fake data, false analysis—who still believes in this these days?

View OriginalReply0

RatioHunter

· 01-06 12:59

Annual cash flow of $24 million? This income really🤔 If it can stay stable, it’s valuable --- 3.89 million coins in annual destruction sounds like a lot, but the key is how long it can be sustained --- 600,000 in ten days, at first glance not much, but it’s actually okay; it depends on whether it can be stably maintained later --- The coin burning mechanism looks good, but it depends on whether the trading volume can support it; otherwise, it’s just on paper --- The key now is how long this traffic can be maintained; don’t let it drop into negative growth later --- Interesting, at least it has real returns, better than some air projects --- The deflationary expectation is quite strong, but I’m worried that trading volume can’t keep up; otherwise, everything will be pointless

View OriginalReply0