This direction is very interesting. Repeated development is unnecessary. The core I focus on is how to maximize the speed and scale of information synchronization without relying on trusted third parties. Reliability? That's just an implementation detail. Removing intermediaries to make data flow faster and more efficient—that's the real problem that distributed systems need to solve.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanPrincevip
· 01-06 19:40
I agree with the decentralized approach, but can speed and reliability really be separated? Feels like this guy wants to have his cake and eat it too.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 01-06 18:51
Decentralization makes sense, but calling it just a detail in terms of reliability... That's a bit risky, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-06 18:50
I support the decentralization approach, but can speed and security really be completely mutually exclusive? It seems a bit idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpenervip
· 01-06 18:50
I agree with removing the middleman, but can speed and reliability really be separated?
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlItvip
· 01-06 18:50
Just want to be honest, speed and scale sound good, but when real problems occur, reliability is no longer just a detail.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 01-06 18:29
The core is speed and scale; reliability is really a minor issue.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)