History always repeats itself in astonishing ways.
StandX is copying the successful model of Blur. From the project's operational rhythm to the roles of key figures, even the logic of ecosystem expansion is eerily similar. If this path continues, StandX is very likely to sequentially challenge Hyperliquid and Aster, ultimately aiming to dominate the entire Perpdex track, only to fall at the peak—this is the same old script.
Recently, market voices have been praising StandX for pioneering the new Maker Points model. But a careful review of history shows that this approach has actually been used before. The first to truly implement this model and achieve results was a project that once swept through the NFT industry. However, it was later submerged in the tide of history, and few people mention it anymore.
Innovation often works this way—what seems like a fresh model is actually just a reassembly of existing frameworks. How far StandX can go depends not so much on how innovative the model itself is, but on whether it can avoid the pitfalls of its predecessors.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterLucky
· 01-09 14:54
Basically, history just loves to repeat itself. The StandX routine looks very familiar.
Copying the old tricks and still calling it innovation—Maker Points has been played out long ago. Wake up, everyone.
The phrase "falling from the peak" hits home. Blur's script has been played out once already. Can we avoid the pitfalls this time? I doubt it.
Another mirror project, just waiting to see how it crashes and burns.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-08 19:34
History has a way of repeating itself. Watching StandX's approach is like watching a remastered version of Blur. In the end, it still can't escape that cyclical fate.
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 01-06 18:52
Anyone can see the script of history repeating itself, but very few projects can truly avoid the traps.
---
The Maker Points system is not new either; the market just loves to package it as innovation, and retail investors love to rush in.
---
The prophecy of the peak falling is a bit harsh, but on the other hand, it is indeed a replica of Blur.
---
When others succeed once, millions want to copy, but most end up serving as cautionary tales.
---
Innovating the model? 90% of it is borrowed, with 10% relying on execution and luck.
---
The key is how long it can survive; reaching the top or falling often hinges on a single thought.
---
If this logic were really that accurate, we would have been rich long ago. Why bother reading articles here?
---
We don't know if StandX will crash, but 99% of projects copying this routine are bound to fail.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-06 18:28
History repeating itself is getting old; the key is who can truly live longer.
---
Maker Points are just so-so, they've been everywhere for a long time... Let's see if StandX can avoid the pitfalls.
---
The peak falls? Ha, every popular project has played out that script once.
---
Instead of studying how predecessors died, it's better to see who can truly rewrite the script this time.
---
No matter how hyped a new model is, essentially it's just the same thing with a different skin.
---
What's interesting is that knowing you're copying and still able to go this far—how capable are you?
---
Getting old, getting old—looking at any project now feels like watching a rerun.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddict
· 01-06 18:27
Basically, it's just Blur with a different skin. I'm already tired of this routine. How many times are we going to see the script of the peak fall play out?
History always repeats itself in astonishing ways.
StandX is copying the successful model of Blur. From the project's operational rhythm to the roles of key figures, even the logic of ecosystem expansion is eerily similar. If this path continues, StandX is very likely to sequentially challenge Hyperliquid and Aster, ultimately aiming to dominate the entire Perpdex track, only to fall at the peak—this is the same old script.
Recently, market voices have been praising StandX for pioneering the new Maker Points model. But a careful review of history shows that this approach has actually been used before. The first to truly implement this model and achieve results was a project that once swept through the NFT industry. However, it was later submerged in the tide of history, and few people mention it anymore.
Innovation often works this way—what seems like a fresh model is actually just a reassembly of existing frameworks. How far StandX can go depends not so much on how innovative the model itself is, but on whether it can avoid the pitfalls of its predecessors.