The playbook seems pretty familiar at this point. Accumulate the bulk of token supply quietly at basement prices, hype it up to attract retail buyers, then execute a coordinated exit at peak valuations. Classic move. Except here's the thing—once you spot the pattern, you start seeing it everywhere. Projects that follow this exact blueprint tend to crater hard once the musical chairs stops. $yaranaika is worth studying if you want a textbook case of how these mechanics play out. Might be worth keeping on your watch list if only as a reminder of what bad tokenomics and suspicious holder behavior looks like.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Deconstructionist
· 01-07 20:27
I've seen through this routine long ago. $yaranaika is a textbook example of a cautionary tale—hoarding coins, pumping the price, and then running away. I've seen this script countless times, and it's really getting annoying.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 01-06 18:58
Old tricks: accumulating coins at low prices, hyping up the heat, and running away at high positions. This set of tactics has been played repeatedly and is still in use. $yaranaika is a textbook example of a cautionary tale; just a glance at the tokenomics reveals the smell of problems.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 01-06 18:57
This trick has been played out, and you can tell what's going on just by looking at it.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-06 18:50
It's the same old trick again—buying low, creating hype to suck in funds, and then running away at the high... After seeing this so many times, you can really predict when these projects will爆雷.
This $yaranaika token distribution is so distorted; the holding structure is obvious at a glance—typical whale slaughter machine setup.
Be cautious of projects that raised too much in early funding rounds—they either dump the price or go to zero, there's no third option.
Projects that survive the first wave of sell-offs are actually worth paying attention to; those that stick around are genuine.
I've already added them to the blacklist observation list; whenever similar new projects appear, I compare and reference them.
There are too many of these traps now; without basic market reading skills, it's really easy to be fooled by fake bottom-fishing illusions.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 01-06 18:32
I've been tired of this routine for a long time. $yaranaika is just a living lesson—buying low, hyping concepts, collective runaways, cycle after cycle... We really should treat projects like this as negative examples for study.
The playbook seems pretty familiar at this point. Accumulate the bulk of token supply quietly at basement prices, hype it up to attract retail buyers, then execute a coordinated exit at peak valuations. Classic move. Except here's the thing—once you spot the pattern, you start seeing it everywhere. Projects that follow this exact blueprint tend to crater hard once the musical chairs stops. $yaranaika is worth studying if you want a textbook case of how these mechanics play out. Might be worth keeping on your watch list if only as a reminder of what bad tokenomics and suspicious holder behavior looks like.