2026-01-06 19:31:32

Recently, the official stance has clearly shifted, and many people haven't realized this change yet. As a result, those who have accumulated chips at the bottom are now in a dilemma—wanting to sell off but unable to do so. The market liquidity is deep enough, making it far from easy to trigger a panic sell effect.

What's more interesting is that the current active holding addresses have only just surpassed 1,000, indicating that the market is still in the very early stages. From this perspective, a large amount of chips are concentrated in a few addresses, which actually creates a subtle balance—no one dares to sell off recklessly because the cost is too high.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

mev_me_maybe

· 01-09 13:57

Hmm... The official attitude shift has been noticed for a while, it's just that the market response is always a step slow. Dumping in the early stages? Dream on, with such deep liquidity, no one dares to move. Having thousands of addresses concentrated in holdings is actually the real game of chips. This delicate balance probably won't last long; someone will eventually lose control.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 01-08 08:11

The official shift on this matter, indeed some people haven't reacted yet. Concentrated chips turning into protection? That's an interesting logic. A thousand active addresses, in plain terms, still a niche game. If you want to dump but can't, then you can only HODL. The delicate balance in the early stages—who dares to break the deadlock first? Deep liquidity is just an illusion; the real pricing power still lies with the big players. A few addresses hold the lifeline—how long can this situation last?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 01-06 19:59

Ha, a thousand valid addresses? I told you, this is the most classic whale and retail game theory scenario. You can't shake it, brother. The liquidity is deep enough, indicating that the chips are still not sufficiently dispersed. If you really try to shake it, you'll end up hurting yourself.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-06 19:45

The official attitude has changed, but no one really cares about this anymore. People are still staring at the candlestick charts in a daze. A few thousand valid addresses? Not early anymore. The concentration of chips basically means big players are restraining each other; whoever dumps will die. Deep liquidity is just that—deep. The FOMO effect is nonsense. This round, you really can't play the game of cutting the leeks. What does fewer addresses mean? It indicates that there's still a pretty wide window to get in this round. It all depends on whether you're willing to buy the dip. It's not a good thing if the sell-off can't be pushed down. Instead, it shows there's no real consensus on the bottom, which is a bit uncomfortable.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-06 19:39

A change in the official stance can reveal the clues; retail investors are still hesitating, while big players have already known the situation. Want to dump from over a thousand addresses? Haha, such a large move would be counterproductive. That's the beauty of the game.

View OriginalReply0