Matthew Sallee from Tortoise Capital recently broke down something investors keep missing about the AI boom. While everyone's chasing the obvious mega-caps, the real opportunities are hiding in plain sight—those unglamorous companies quietly powering the entire infrastructure.
Here's the thing: when a secular trend takes off like AI has, the money doesn't just flow to the headline names. It gets distributed across the entire supply chain. Battery makers, semiconductor suppliers, specialized manufacturers—these are the picks-and-shovels plays that often outpace the splashier names over medium-term horizons.
Sallee's angle cuts through the noise. Most retail investors get caught chasing yesterday's winners. The institutional playbook is different. They're mapping out which companies will benefit from sustained capex cycles, which have pricing power, and which are still trading below intrinsic value.
The lesson here: if you're building an AI-focused portfolio, don't just stop at the obvious tickers. Dig into the supply chain, check who's supplying mission-critical components, and ask yourself which businesses have structural moats that'll survive the next market correction. That's where the real edge lies.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektHunter
· 01-08 20:56
I'm tired of that same old "hidden treasure in the corner" theory again.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 01-08 17:16
Damn, it's the same supply chain theory again... I've been saying this all along, why is it only gaining popularity now?
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-08 07:18
Damn, it's the same old tired supply chain argument again, but to be honest, there's some truth to it... When retail investors chase the hot trends, institutions are already laying in wait downstream.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 01-06 20:30
It's the same narrative about mining supply chains again, how many times have I heard it... But on the other hand, some people are indeed making money.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-06 20:29
Damn, it's the same old trick again. Retail investors chase the leading stocks of the trend every day, while institutions have already laid in wait at the bottom of the supply chain. By the time you react, they've already made a full profit.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-06 20:25
Damn, it's that supply chain story again... But to be honest, it's really easy to overlook.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 01-06 20:22
Oh no, it's that same "mining the supply chain" argument again... but indeed, many people are blindly chasing after tech giants, ignoring those quiet component manufacturers that are quietly making money.
---
Honestly, retail investors love to chase hot topics, while institutions are quietly building their moats. The difference is huge.
---
The "picks and shovels" approach is actually old news; the key is to find companies that truly have pricing power and are resilient to downturns...
---
It sounds simple, but actually finding supply chain companies worth holding is not that easy; you have to put in the effort to screen.
---
Alright, alright, another investment tip of "don't just look at big companies," but come to think of it... this time, it seems to be on point.
---
Remember last year's wave, how many people were all in on big tech, but it turned out those small factories whose names you can't even remember ended up outperforming.
---
Makes sense but oversimplifies... real structural moats are hard to find, and it's still a gamble on luck.
---
This idea is correct, but no matter how much retail investors listen, it’s all in vain; execution is the real barrier.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 01-06 20:20
The business of selling shovels is always more stable than digging for gold. Why do so many people find this principle so hard to understand?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoTarotReader
· 01-06 20:20
Damn, it's the same supply chain rhetoric again... But indeed, many people are still chasing after giants like Nvidia and OpenAI. Maybe it's time to look at the upstream of chip manufacturing and power supplies.
Matthew Sallee from Tortoise Capital recently broke down something investors keep missing about the AI boom. While everyone's chasing the obvious mega-caps, the real opportunities are hiding in plain sight—those unglamorous companies quietly powering the entire infrastructure.
Here's the thing: when a secular trend takes off like AI has, the money doesn't just flow to the headline names. It gets distributed across the entire supply chain. Battery makers, semiconductor suppliers, specialized manufacturers—these are the picks-and-shovels plays that often outpace the splashier names over medium-term horizons.
Sallee's angle cuts through the noise. Most retail investors get caught chasing yesterday's winners. The institutional playbook is different. They're mapping out which companies will benefit from sustained capex cycles, which have pricing power, and which are still trading below intrinsic value.
The lesson here: if you're building an AI-focused portfolio, don't just stop at the obvious tickers. Dig into the supply chain, check who's supplying mission-critical components, and ask yourself which businesses have structural moats that'll survive the next market correction. That's where the real edge lies.