Recent reports suggest that the United States may seize cryptocurrencies held by the Venezuelan government, involving sanctions-related provisions. According to public reports, the Venezuelan government has attempted to bypass financial restrictions imposed by the US dollar through the stablecoin Tether—this reflects a reality: in the context of increasingly strict global sanctions frameworks, stablecoins are becoming tools for various parties to circumvent traditional financial controls.
This case is quite interesting. On one hand, it demonstrates that stablecoins indeed have advantages in cross-border transfers and avoiding foreign exchange controls; on the other hand, US regulators' ability to track and freeze crypto assets is also improving—on-chain transactions are supposed to be "immutable," but they can ultimately be influenced by political forces.
For traders, this serves as a reminder of a well-known but often overlooked risk: even if assets are on-chain, they are not immune to real-world regulatory constraints. The security of stablecoins largely depends on the policy stance of the country where the issuing institution is located.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityLarry
· 1h ago
On-chain can't escape real-world politics either, this is quite awkward.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 01-08 10:30
On the blockchain, you can't escape reality either. This is what I've been saying all along: no matter how secure your coins are, you still have to look at the issuing institution's attitude.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 01-07 01:30
On-chain assets can't escape reality either; this is the most heartbreaking truth.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobia
· 01-07 01:30
On the chain is on the chain, reality is still reality... The US methods are truly ruthless. Stablecoins may seem free, but it's actually just an illusion.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 01-07 01:25
Basically, it still can't escape the grasp of the United States; no matter how decentralized on the chain, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 01-07 01:25
It's the US again playing the "on-chain freezing" game. Where's the promised decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 01-07 01:25
It's quite heartbreaking; on-chain freedom can't compete with dollar hegemony...
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 01-07 01:17
On-chain freedom is a lie; frankly, it still depends on the US's attitude.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 01-07 01:11
Decentralization is just a facade; real power still lies in traditional finance. The situation in Venezuela is a vivid example.
Recent reports suggest that the United States may seize cryptocurrencies held by the Venezuelan government, involving sanctions-related provisions. According to public reports, the Venezuelan government has attempted to bypass financial restrictions imposed by the US dollar through the stablecoin Tether—this reflects a reality: in the context of increasingly strict global sanctions frameworks, stablecoins are becoming tools for various parties to circumvent traditional financial controls.
This case is quite interesting. On one hand, it demonstrates that stablecoins indeed have advantages in cross-border transfers and avoiding foreign exchange controls; on the other hand, US regulators' ability to track and freeze crypto assets is also improving—on-chain transactions are supposed to be "immutable," but they can ultimately be influenced by political forces.
For traders, this serves as a reminder of a well-known but often overlooked risk: even if assets are on-chain, they are not immune to real-world regulatory constraints. The security of stablecoins largely depends on the policy stance of the country where the issuing institution is located.