The short position set the day before yesterday was forgotten to be closed in time, and last night's market gap directly filled all the orders. This wave of movement is quite interesting, and whether $BREV can continue to probe down to the 0.9 level is really uncertain.
The previous analysis approach now seems a bit awkward—originally, I wanted to place a trial order at a high level, but the market directly gave an unnecessary answer. However, from a technical perspective, if $BREV continues to weaken, this price level is not entirely impossible.
The key still depends on whether the trading volume can keep up. Sometimes, a one-sided decline can lead to a quick rebound, and other times, it can truly break through. The current focus is on whether this support can hold, or else we might need to prepare for a deeper level.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugee
· 01-10 08:24
Oh no, this move was directly slapped in the face by the market. Gaps are really unpredictable and hard to defend against.
If the trading volume doesn't pick up, it all feels meaningless. We still have to wait and see if the support or resistance holds—that's the real test.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 01-08 14:19
Haha, this loss caught me a bit off guard.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 01-07 08:56
Haha, forgetting to settle the order is indeed awkward, but gap trading can also be considered a response from the market. As for the 0.9 level, let's see how the trading volume reacts.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 01-07 08:54
Oh brother, this wave was directly a market education. How uncomfortable it must have been at the moment of gap trading.
That 0.9 point, if the volume can't keep up, it's a false breakout. It looks scary, but in fact, there's huge room for a rebound.
If the support can't hold, just keep looking downward. Anyway, since you're already losing, what are you afraid of?
The high-level test and error orders are the biggest test of patience. Next time, remember to set a stop-loss or just don't sleep at all.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 01-07 08:52
Haha, I totally understand the feeling of being violently gap-checked out. The supposed trial-and-error order has stubbornly turned into a real position.
However, the rebound probability at this level is still quite high. If the trading volume is insufficient, it's hard to truly break through.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 01-07 08:52
Haha, it's another day of being hammered by the market. Gap trading is really something else. 0.9 still depends on volume to speak.
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 01-07 08:50
Oops, forgetting to hedge the position was really heartbreaking, it hit the stop-loss directly 😅
But to be honest, the 0.9 level is really risky, it depends on the volume whether it will hold or not
The short position set the day before yesterday was forgotten to be closed in time, and last night's market gap directly filled all the orders. This wave of movement is quite interesting, and whether $BREV can continue to probe down to the 0.9 level is really uncertain.
The previous analysis approach now seems a bit awkward—originally, I wanted to place a trial order at a high level, but the market directly gave an unnecessary answer. However, from a technical perspective, if $BREV continues to weaken, this price level is not entirely impossible.
The key still depends on whether the trading volume can keep up. Sometimes, a one-sided decline can lead to a quick rebound, and other times, it can truly break through. The current focus is on whether this support can hold, or else we might need to prepare for a deeper level.