2026-01-07 09:20:44

It wasn't until later that I realized that the core appeal of Inference Labs is not how advanced their algorithms are, but whether you are willing to trust their judgment.

The most impressive aspect of TruthTensor is not stacking complex features. What truly attracts people is its mechanism of repeated verification and dynamic correction. Currently, user feedback has led to over 80+ iterations and adjustments. What does this indicate? It shows that the project team is listening to the market's voice and continuously refining.

From "intelligence" to "credibility," this shift in mindset is quite worth pondering for the entire on-chain application ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OvertimeSquid

· 01-10 07:58

Trust > algorithms, I agree with this logic. Over 80 iterations, what does that say? It means no bragging, we're really getting things done.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 01-09 09:32

Trust > Algorithm, this logic has indeed been understood. Over 80 iterations may not seem like a lot, but the real question is—how many projects dare to change so frequently? This approach is correct; credibility is the real killer.

View OriginalReply0

UncleLiquidation

· 01-07 09:50

Over 80 iterations, how long does that take... But on the other hand, it's truly rare to see a project that genuinely listens to feedback.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-07 09:50

Oh my, trust really matters more than the algorithm itself. Finally, a project is thinking things through thoroughly. 80+ iterations? Now that's real work, unlike some projects that boast but then go silent. The shift from intelligence to trustworthiness is definitely worth pondering. Web3 is missing this kind of reliable stuff.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 01-07 09:42

Honestly, over 80 iterations really show some substance, much more reliable than projects that promise overnight riches. Trust is something that can't be Photoshopped; it has to be built step by step.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 01-07 09:30

Trustworthiness is more important than the algorithm itself, I agree with that. What does 80+ iterations indicate? It shows that real work is being done rather than just talk. The aspect of credibility is indeed a pain point. It's a pretty realistic shift; how come other projects haven't thought of it? So, is TruthTensor considered to have found a way to apply on-chain? This approach is correct; only then can the user experience keep up. Whether the verification mechanism can truly guarantee transparency remains a question. Listening to market feedback is good, but it depends on whether the direction of iterations is right. Over 80 adjustments—if the direction is wrong, it's all for nothing. Trust is hard to build, but it can be destroyed in an instant. Interesting, continuing to observe.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 01-07 09:27

Forget it, another trust badge. Thinking you can prove yourself in 80 iterations? What I want to see is real data with actual funds, not this "I'm listening to the market" rhetoric.

View OriginalReply0