2026-01-07 09:21:28

A major mainstream DEX platform has just released an update deployment for the V2 router contract. How to describe this upgrade? Users and developers actually won't notice much change—the interface and calling methods remain the same, it's just backend optimization.

Key points: The new V2 router is now recommended for use, both new and old contracts can enjoy up to 99% energy subsidies, and the energy subsidy policy remains unchanged.

The platform continues to work on technical stack and resource allocation, aiming to provide on-chain trading users with a more stable, safer, and more efficient trading environment. From code deployment to policy adjustments, this update seems to be quite thoughtful.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldHunter

· 9h ago

ngl, "backend optimization" is just code for they finally fixed something that was quietly bleeding liquidity... anyway, 99% subsidy on both versions? that's either unsustainable or they're planning to rug it in q3 lol

Reply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 14h ago

Backend optimization sounds good, but I feel like it's all just nice-sounding words. It's always 99% subsidies and upgrades; I've seen this trick too many times. But on the other hand, at least they didn't spend money to change the interface, which is somewhat conscientious.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 17h ago

It's the same kind of "we are optimizing" statement, which belongs to quietly doing big things. Anyway, since the interface hasn't changed, no need to bother with migration, which is somewhat considerate. 99% subsidies sound impressive, but the key is how much real gold and silver can save on gas. Is this update genuinely focused on user experience or just another marketing stunt? Time will tell. From the platform's stance, it seems they want to put a lot of effort into stability. The most annoying part of contract upgrades is migration costs, but luckily, this time there are none. Energy subsidies remain unchanged; this statement feels a bit perfunctory and lacks novelty. Backend optimization sounds good, but I don't know how much faster it will be; real-world testing is the only proof. No matter how good the words, on-chain verification is necessary; just looking at announcements doesn't mean much.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-07 09:51

Backend optimization is my favorite. It may not be visible on the surface, but the wallet can feel it. This is true dedication.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 01-07 09:50

Another seemingly calm update on the surface, with backend optimizations secretly made. I just want to know how much the actual performance has improved. To put it nicely, it’s basically the same interface, so just use it confidently. Anyway, the subsidy remains at 99%. Hey, this time it’s backward compatible, no need to rush the migration. The details are handled quite thoughtfully. The 99% energy subsidy remains unchanged, which is the key point. Everything else is just superficial. Wait, has the stability really improved, or is this just another PPT upgrade? Contract optimization is indeed necessary, but the changes users can feel... hmm, let’s observe first.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-07 09:45

Interface compatibility remains unchanged; I need to test it myself to trust it. A 99% subsidy sounds great, but I need to calculate how much gas is actually saved.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 01-07 09:41

backwards compatibility ftw, but tbh where's the actual gas optimization data? need to see the benchmarks before i buy the hype

Reply0

HashBandit

· 01-07 09:35

ngl, "backend optimizations" is code for "we're trying to squeeze more TPS without blowing up gas fees again" - seen this movie before lol. anyway 99% subsidy on both versions? that's actually not terrible, back in my mining days we'd kill for that kind of deal

Reply0

SingleForYears

· 01-07 09:28

Hi, with this update, the interface hasn't changed but we still have to upgrade? Again with the "users won't notice but we're working hard" excuse. Is the 99% energy subsidy real? It doesn't quite sound like the truth. Backend optimization... what exactly was optimized? Just explain clearly. Alright, as long as the gas fees are cheap, that's all that matters. Who cares how the update was done. What the heck, can you still use the old version at the same time? So what's the advantage of the new version? That's a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0