On the seventh day of continuous optimization, I want to share some recent progress with everyone.
Recently, the altcoin market has indeed been very quiet. After BREV was listed, there was a slight boost in activity, but overall, there hasn't been much improvement. However, after adjusting the data parameters, my entry signals have become much clearer, and I am more confident in judging the market's bullish or bearish trends—these signals' recognition efficiency has significantly improved.
But it also exposed some new issues. Bottom signals are still easy to miss, and there is quite a bit of market noise. Currently, my energy can't keep up with the pace. These are the areas to focus on optimizing in the next round.
Trading is a continuous iteration process; each adjustment reveals new insights. Keep going!
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 01-09 17:21
It's really annoying that the signal is missing at the bottom; I need to find a way to reduce noise interference.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-08 20:01
Still tuning parameters on the seventh day? I'm only concerned with the gwei on the gas tracker now. When will adjusting parameters reach a limit?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 01-07 09:51
Missing the bottom signal is indeed something that needs attention; too much noise can really drive people crazy.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-07 09:51
Bottom signal is really easy to miss, and there's too much noise to tell what's a real breakout and what's a fake fall.
It feels like I need to review the entire system again, otherwise any further optimization will only be a superficial fix.
Altcoins have indeed been very dull lately, BREV is just like that, with no major waves.
Seven days and still tweaking parameters? I think if the core logic is off, adjusting it again is just pointless.
But this iterative approach is indeed correct; let's slowly get closer to the truth.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 01-07 09:38
The improvement in signal recognition efficiency is real, but bottom-fishing still easily leads to losses.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 01-07 09:24
I totally understand the part about missing the bottom signal; when there's a lot of noise, it's really easy to get cut off.
View OriginalReply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 01-07 09:22
The issue of easily missing bottom signals is a bit upsetting, and the noise is indeed bothersome.
Algorithm optimization really has to be done step by step; there are no quick solutions.
BREV's popularity faded so quickly, still have to wait for another opportunity.
On the seventh day of continuous optimization, I want to share some recent progress with everyone.
Recently, the altcoin market has indeed been very quiet. After BREV was listed, there was a slight boost in activity, but overall, there hasn't been much improvement. However, after adjusting the data parameters, my entry signals have become much clearer, and I am more confident in judging the market's bullish or bearish trends—these signals' recognition efficiency has significantly improved.
But it also exposed some new issues. Bottom signals are still easy to miss, and there is quite a bit of market noise. Currently, my energy can't keep up with the pace. These are the areas to focus on optimizing in the next round.
Trading is a continuous iteration process; each adjustment reveals new insights. Keep going!