2026-01-07 10:24:29

Recently, the crypto market has sent two major signals worth paying attention to.

First is the public statement from a U.S. bank—advising clients to include a 4% crypto exposure in their asset allocation. This is not just the personal opinion of an analyst but an official guidance from a top Wall Street institution. Behind it lies the first clear compliant entry path for hundreds of trillions of dollars in traditional funds. From this perspective, institutional recognition of crypto assets has already taken shape.

Second, the Federal Reserve management indicated that this year should see interest rate cuts exceeding 100 basis points, far beyond the market’s previous expectations. What does a significant increase in cheap capital mean? The risk-free rate is being pushed down, forcing institutions and retail investors to seek higher-yield investment channels.

Combining these two developments is quite interesting. Rate cuts reduce the attractiveness of bonds and fixed deposits, while the asset allocation advice from U.S. banks just happens to point this free capital towards the crypto market. This is a typical resonance between macro liquidity and policy guidance.

From a market structure perspective, cryptocurrencies are transitioning from a phase dominated by retail and short-term speculators to a new era of institutional allocation and long-term capital participation. This shift is driven by two forces: first, expectations of easing policies; second, a deepening understanding of this asset class by traditional finance.

The opportunity from the last halving cycle has passed, but this wave of institutional entry combined with the rate cut trend remains scarce. The question is, can this allocation trend truly change the market’s liquidity landscape? How large will the multiplier effect of rate cuts be? How long will it take for the market to digest these changes? All these are worth observing.

What are your thoughts? Will this cycle be different?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 01-10 05:18

Bank of America 4% allocation, to put it simply, is the official entry of traditional finance, coupled with a 100 basis point rate cut... This time really is different, institutional funds are coming in.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-07 10:54

The 4% suggestion from US banks sounds good, but honestly, I'm more concerned about when the funds will actually be credited to the account. Talking without action—who would believe it? Cut interest rates by over 100 basis points? That's just printing money. Traditional finance will be forced into the crypto space this time, no way around it. The question is whether institutions will really allocate or if it's just another scam to trap retail investors. We've seen this many times before, and I've learned to be smarter. What's different this time? It's probably just big players entering the market. I just want to know when they'll start bottom-fishing. How long will it take for the liquidity landscape to change? That's the real issue. Stop hyping up empty promises.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-07 10:52

The 4% allocation recommendation from US banks has really arrived, but I'm more concerned about how long this can last. Macro liquidity is indeed a catalyst, but the question is whether large funds will hold this long-term or if it's just another prelude to a new round of harvesting retail investors?

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 01-07 10:52

Bank of America 4% allocation suggestion? Uh... sounds good, but it's hard to say right now whether it can be fulfilled. A 100bp rate cut is indeed interesting, but history shows that cheap money can also be squandered. Is institutional investment truly entering, or is it another round of cutting? Let's watch and see.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-07 10:44

Uh... Is the 4% recommendation from US banks serious? Or is it just another trick before they cut the grass again? Wall Street enters the market listening to the US, but they always make more than retail investors. A 100 basis point rate cut sounds impressive, but how much of that actually flows into the crypto world? Institutional entry = a new trick for big players to cut small investors. I still prefer to mine steadily. If a big surge were really coming, it would have already happened. Everyone talking about it now just wants to catch the falling knife. The macro narrative of rate cuts is brought up every round, but in the end? It all depends on the market maker’s mood. Instead of waiting for institutions to allocate, why not mine steadily for stable returns? Isn’t it more satisfying to earn a few bucks per transaction?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 01-07 10:39

If Bank of America dares to make such an official announcement, it shows that traditional finance is really about to step down. This time is different.

View OriginalReply0