Bitcoin short to medium-term outlook is bullish. This is a trading idea based on aggressive limit orders.
The core logic is straightforward—aggressive traders buy in at 91300, while conservative traders wait until 88600 to enter. The average entry price for both points is around 89000. Keep the position size moderate, around 2 to 4 points is sufficient. The key is to set a good stop-loss.
The short-term target after entry is between 92144 and 93144, representing a profit zone. If the price can hold, the medium-term target shifts to the range of 94344 to 99444. Set the stop-loss at 87744; if it breaks this level, accept the loss.
This strategy has an approximate win rate of 60%. Honestly, it's not very high, so proper risk management is essential. Once you take profit, don't be greedy—immediately move the stop-loss to the breakeven point. This way, you can protect profits and leave room for further upward movement.
This is purely personal analysis and discussion, not investment advice. Please assess the risks yourself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenDreamer
· 10h ago
Honestly, a 60% win rate is a bit shaky; it's better for us to bet on an upward trend.
The aggressive trader who entered at 91300 really dares to do it; I won't move until 88600.
These numbers precise to the units are a bit hard to believe; I can hit 99444 during the midline, and I'll eat chips live.
Stop loss at 87744 is a bit tight; I'm afraid of getting smashed through.
The key is to control your hands—take profit and run, don't expect a skyrocket.
Honestly, this set of logic is pretty much the same as last time; it's just about chasing win rate, but real profit still depends on luck.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-08 03:52
A 60% win rate is quite honest, much more reliable than those claiming 100%.
I'm just worried that holding onto unrealized gains and being reluctant to take profits, then losing everything in a pullback.
The 88600 level is indeed tempting; it depends on whether the trading volume supports it.
Aggressive players are about to start gambling again. I'll wait and see if the price breaks the level before making a move.
If this wave really reaches 99444, I'll do a live stream eating shoes, but I need to survive past 87744 first.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-07 22:12
60% win rate and still dare to be so mysterious, I believe you're full of nonsense.
The conservative group bought in at 88600? Probably going to get trapped and stuck.
These numbers are precise down to the units, feels like just hyping up a story.
Stop-loss at 87744—if broken, admit defeat. Easy to say, but who can hold on when losing money?
2 to 4 percent position size sounds not aggressive, but in reality, it's full position with leverage.
Being both aggressive and conservative at the same time, just pick one position. How to fill the space in between?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnon
· 01-07 10:57
60% win rate, so you really need to stick to risk management, or you'll suffer heavy losses sooner or later.
88600 feels like a level that will be tested repeatedly, don't rush to buy in.
It's another "not investment advice," fine, I'll handle it myself.
The explanation about position sizing sounds reliable; trying small amounts multiple times is better than going all-in and losing everything.
The guy who directly bought in at 91300, let's see if he can catch this rebound later.
Stop loss at 87744 is quite precise, at least it's not an absurdly wide one.
How long will it take to reach the target of 99444? Let's be realistic in the short term.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 01-07 10:57
60% win rate? Sounds good, but actually it's just about a 50/50 chance. I'm still on the sidelines watching.
Honestly, this wave's momentum feels a bit tight; I might not catch the 88600 level.
A position size of 2-4 points isn't aggressive? For a player like me, that's already quite bold, haha.
Stop loss at 87744. If it breaks, I have to run. I agree with this; no illusions.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-07 10:57
60% win rate, so precise stop-loss is necessary, otherwise you'll be back to break-even in no time.
Waiting for 88600 or going straight to 91300 depends on your mindset. I can't handle this wave.
Another bunch of numbers, keep your position small, and don't think about getting rich overnight.
If you can run at 92 to 93, do it. Greed is deadly, my friends.
Stop-loss at 87744, once broken, admit defeat. Otherwise, holding a few points will be uncomfortable.
Long-term bullish outlook is bullish, but with this 60% win rate... honestly, it's a bit uncertain.
I agree with moving the stop-loss to the cost price; at least you can sleep peacefully.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon42
· 01-07 10:45
60% win rate and still dare to operate like this? I still think it's too risky.
---
Is 88600 really stable to enter? Feels like the bottom isn't confirmed yet.
---
Again limit orders, stop losses, take profits... so troublesome.
---
Is it possible to just throw in directly and then close your eyes and sleep haha.
---
I've seen this logic too many times, and in the end, it's the group of people who lose money doing a review.
---
Position size of 2 to 4 points, is this discouraging or teasing me?
---
I believe in medium-term bullishness, but I haven't seen this chart point.
---
Stop loss at 87744... if broken, exit immediately. Easier said than done, it can be life-threatening.
---
99444 feels a bit greedy, to be honest.
---
Another aggressive plan, my wallet is already crying.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 01-07 10:39
A 60% win rate and still dare to be so confident, I really respect that.
---
That 88600 level is a bit risky; it depends on how the US market moves tonight.
---
It's always around the average price of 89000. This routine is pretty much the same every time. Make money and run, don't wait for a squeeze.
---
Those who don't cut losses are all狼人杀. Holding this line is very important, brother.
---
These numbers are too neat; I always feel something's off...
---
Is short-term trading on these few points interesting? It's better to wait for a higher-level signal.
---
Hey, you even have the price precise to the units at 92144. How did you get that signal?
---
Daring to write the word "surrender," at least shows some sincerity.
---
Position size of 2 to 4 points, then I might as well go all-in for faster results.
---
Giving room for subsequent rises? By then, you'll be shaken out early.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 01-07 10:31
A 60% win rate and still dare to be so detailed, really makes me speechless.
---
Can't wait for the 88600 level, already jumped in early haha.
---
It's always about setting stop-loss here and there, the key is whether you have the mental strength to hold on.
---
For the aggressive traders entering at 91300, it still feels a bit too high.
---
Greed is the eternal enemy, easy to say but hard to do.
---
Mid-term target 99444? Master of pie-in-the-sky plans.
---
This approach is basically betting on a rise. I still stick to my own rhythm.
Bitcoin short to medium-term outlook is bullish. This is a trading idea based on aggressive limit orders.
The core logic is straightforward—aggressive traders buy in at 91300, while conservative traders wait until 88600 to enter. The average entry price for both points is around 89000. Keep the position size moderate, around 2 to 4 points is sufficient. The key is to set a good stop-loss.
The short-term target after entry is between 92144 and 93144, representing a profit zone. If the price can hold, the medium-term target shifts to the range of 94344 to 99444. Set the stop-loss at 87744; if it breaks this level, accept the loss.
This strategy has an approximate win rate of 60%. Honestly, it's not very high, so proper risk management is essential. Once you take profit, don't be greedy—immediately move the stop-loss to the breakeven point. This way, you can protect profits and leave room for further upward movement.
This is purely personal analysis and discussion, not investment advice. Please assess the risks yourself.