2026-01-07 10:28:53

Many technologies are fundamentally about automating task execution. But some projects are doing something else—automating coordination.

This difference is crucial.

The hidden costs of modern systems lie in coordination: endless meetings, dashboards to monitor, manual reviews needed, and frequent bottlenecks between modules. Failures of current robots are often not due to incapability but because of issues in upstream and downstream cooperation. Mastering coordination can elevate the overall system efficiency by an order of magnitude. That’s why some projects, even if not the most advanced technically, can outperform their competitors.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ServantOfSatoshi

· 01-10 10:20

Well said, coordination is the real pain point. Most people only see the surface of automation tasks. Oh my god, finally someone explained it clearly. Our team has collapsed several times because of coordination issues. Isn't this the problem between different chains in Web3? The technology is awesome, but messages can't get through. That makes sense. No wonder the seemingly insignificant projects tend to last the longest. Exactly, if one link in the upstream or downstream chain gets stuck, the entire system collapses. Coordination costs are truly terrifying.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-09 05:42

Coordination is truly the bottleneck. Many projects focus only on showcasing technology, resulting in disorganized modules. Ultimately, the winner is the one who can automate complex communication. This idea is so clever; no wonder some dark horses can make a comeback—they are essentially working on the system's "adhesive."

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 01-09 03:34

Basically, it's stuck at the coordination layer, which is really the bottleneck. Getting coordination right is much more valuable than showing off technical skills; that's just how reality is.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 01-07 10:58

Really, it's to the point. Most projects are still competing over algorithm performance, unaware that the bottleneck is actually those broken coordination logics, with a bunch of manpower acting as middlemen.

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 01-07 10:52

Really, coordination is the key. Don't get caught up in technical indicators; they're all fake. I only increased my position because I firmly believe in this logic, and I believe we will break through.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 01-07 10:46

honestly this coordination layer angle hits different... most projects stay obsessed with raw execution speed but completely sleep on the handshake problem. analyzed thoroughly and yeah, the bottleneck's usually not the compute, it's everything breaking when modules try to talk

Reply0

NervousFingers

· 01-07 10:41

Really, coordination is the bottleneck, and most projects are completely unaware of it. --- In plain terms, isn't it just about replacing manual coordination with machines? That's the key to reducing costs. --- Good coordination can win even with poor technology, and this statement hits the mark. --- It feels like many teams are still competing over performance metrics, but they haven't realized that coordination is the ceiling. --- Failures caused by poor upstream and downstream cooperation are really common; no one pays attention to the coordination layer.

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 01-07 10:36

Coordination is the key, this insight is excellent. Many teams are still focused on optimizing individual points, while others are already addressing system-level bottleneck issues.

View OriginalReply0