2026-01-07 11:23:34

Regarding the market performance after the launch of a new project, there are several different opinions circulating in the market.

Some believe that many projects share a common problem——reaching a peak at launch and then falling into a continuous decline. These projects often rely on hype and expectations to support the price in the early stages, but lack long-term fundamental support, ultimately leading to a downward trend.

Others believe that this time is different. They point out that a leading exchange played a key role, effectively supporting the price through reasonable liquidity management and market participation. This view holds that the project team’s and platform’s collaboration ability has become an important factor in determining post-launch performance. This perspective undoubtedly challenges those market comments that focus solely on technical aspects.

Different people have completely different understandings of the same phenomenon, which is also what makes the crypto market interesting——there are no absolute right or wrong, only different market perceptions and risk tolerance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-10 00:09

It's the same old story, just the exchange protecting the market, don't talk about liquidity management. It reminds me of that project last time, with an issuance price of three dollars, listed at ten dollars, now at zero point five... Collaboration ability? Basically, whoever pays more. A truly good project doesn't need an exchange to rescue it at all, right? This logic makes sense. Still holding it, just betting it won't go to zero, haha. I just want to know how many people will be trapped again this time... If this wave can last until the end of next year, it would be considered a success, honestly.

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-09 23:32

Same old rhetoric, tired of hearing it --- Exchange liquidity management? Basically just throwing money to support the market --- Strong collaboration ability means no decline? Then why are so many projects still lying on the floor --- If the fundamentals are weak, no matter how much you throw, it’s useless. Eventually, it will return to the starting point --- I really don’t dare to touch prices supported by exchanges --- The technical aspect might be poor, but a stable market is truly reliable --- Those chasing hot trends and new projects have probably been burned, haha --- Liquidity management sounds fancy, but it’s just market manipulation --- Is this time really different? They say that every time they launch --- Instead of trusting collaboration ability, I trust the fundamentals speak for themselves

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractWorker

· 01-07 11:52

The high break-even rate really calls for reflection While exchange liquidity management can indeed improve, a poor fundamental still means nothing It's the same old story... The problem is that most projects probably know they'll fall before launching How long can an exchange platform last? Anyway, I don't believe those stories This time it's different? Every time they say that haha Reaching a peak immediately after launch has long been an old trick; the real question is whose funds are deep enough So, when choosing projects, you still need to look at the background; just looking at K-line charts is really naive

View OriginalReply0

ProxyCollector

· 01-07 11:46

Really? It still depends on the exchange to support the market. Once the exchange withdraws liquidity, the recovery pattern immediately appears. To put it simply, it still depends on whose big money backer is more powerful. It's both technical and fundamental; isn't it just political correctness? Wait, is there really a difference this time? Why do I feel like it's the same old trick?

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-07 11:33

Damn, it's the exchange manipulating the market again. No wonder retail investors are always the bagholders. Liquidity management? Basically, it's the whales protecting the market. The price peaks immediately after listing. I can see through this trick with my eyes closed. Fundamentals? Ha, with the exchange backing, nothing is a problem. Projects that rely on exchanges to survive will eventually fail. Another scheme where big players coordinate to harvest retail investors. The technical analysis is indeed garbage, but the exchange is calling the shots. Projects without fundamentals are just gambling; don't bother packaging them.

View OriginalReply0