2026-01-07 11:28:46

Kaito recently adjusted its operational rules, and this change has a significant impact. Now, almost every project has set a yap participation threshold, and in the future, it may become more transparent with specific requirements announced directly for each project.

This wave of adjustments has caused many participants to drop from the original leaderboard. Everyone has started discussing that 100 yap is very likely to evolve into the standard threshold for most projects in the future.

Honestly, if you don't rely on short-term operations and follow the regular personal operation rhythm, reaching 100 yap as a threshold is still achievable, and the difficulty won't be particularly high. This also reflects the community's gradual establishment of a more standardized participation mechanism.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Rugman_Walking

· 7h ago

The 100 yap threshold thing, to put it plainly, is that the sieve is getting finer and finer, and lazy people will fall behind. The leaderboard is undergoing a major reshuffle, and this was long overdue. 100 yap? Just accumulate slowly, it's not impossible. This standardization is pretty good, much better than the chaos before. It seems Kaito is serious about playing for real now; I respect this move to unify the threshold. If you can't make a short-term push, then just play the long game and win passively. Many people are probably panicking now, haha. I'm not surprised if 100 yap really becomes the standard; I had a premonition about this. This wave of adjustments isn't very friendly to small retail investors. Standardization is a good thing, but I'm more concerned about whether the rules will be changed again in the future.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-07 11:58

Another barrier... I saw too many of these "standardization" tricks in 2018. In the end, what happened? The project team still ran away, and the barrier was just a formality. 100 yap as standard? Haha, wait until it becomes 1000 yap someday, then you'll know what this is called.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 01-07 11:56

100yap is indeed easy to reach, it all depends on whether you dare to really yap --- Another wave of people will drop the rankings, this is probably the fate of web3 --- Transparency rules are actually pretty good, better than playing in the dark --- Short-term operations are the way to go, anyone who believes in conventional management will lose --- If the 100 yap threshold really materializes, how many people will cry in the toilet --- Standardization sounds good, but I'm afraid it will get more and more competitive later --- The problem is most people simply can't stick to it, yap 100 times and they get themselves into yap --- Those who say it's not difficult are all people who have already gone ashore --- This wave of adjustment feels like a covert way of screening people, but it's also progress --- Kaito's move is still a bit ruthless, forcibly stratifying participants --- So in the end, it still depends on operation; there's no shortcut, and this saying is already outdated

View OriginalReply0

TheShibaWhisperer

· 01-07 11:56

The 100Yap threshold really isn't a big deal; it depends on how you operate. Hold on, dropped from the leaderboard again? Whose fault is it this time? Transparency is indeed overdue; it's better than secretly changing the rules.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 01-07 11:54

100yap is not a high threshold, just yap without thinking to reach it --- Here comes the hype again, this time directly cutting people, huh --- Transparency is pretty good, at least no more guessing, just worried about new tricks being played again --- The group that dropped from the leaderboard is probably crying in the corner now --- If normal operations can be achieved, then it means everyone is expected to do daily --- 100yap standard? Alright, I was already outputting wildly anyway --- The rule change is indeed a bit harsh, but it's still better than black-box operations --- Why does it feel like the threshold is getting higher and higher? I really can't keep up --- What lowers my enthusiasm isn't the difficulty, but the feeling of rules changing all the time --- Not bad, not bad, at least there's a clear statement now, feels good

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 01-07 11:29

The 100 yap threshold, to put it simply, is about filtering out truly active users, right? Too lazy to argue about it. --- People who drop off the leaderboard must feel bad, but isn't this actually more fair? --- Wait, does this mean I need to work harder for yap? --- As long as you don't operate every day, I think it's acceptable. --- Transparency is pretty good; at least there's no need to guess each project's tactics. --- Wait, is 100 yap really not high? Why do I feel like it's a bit uncertain? --- Standardization is like this; there will always be people who can't adapt. --- Rather than saying the threshold is high, it's more like they want this group of people. --- Those who rely on rushing the leaderboard must be very anxious now, haha. --- If this pace continues, how much pressure will new members face in the future?

View OriginalReply0