Are 90% of the gains lost? Data illusion is the real culprit
High popularity ≠ project health, on-chain data ≠ absolute truth. As an on-chain researcher, my daily job is to expose these bubbles. Sharing my three-layer verification system, combined with two handy tools: on-chain behavior microscope and narrative heat radar.
The first layer is the most critical—comparing narrative heat to on-chain reality. For seemingly hot projects, what is the actual on-chain activity like? The gap is often huge. Divergence between social buzz and wallet activity is a warning sign of a failed pump. To avoid becoming a victim, you need to learn to spot this discrepancy at a glance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
26 Likes
Reward
26
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSunnyDay
· 01-10 11:10
Trying to scam me again? If the price difference was this big, I would have already run away.
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 01-08 03:10
Always look at these "on-chain researchers" analyses, but I still got liquidated. LOL
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 01-07 12:01
Social buzz is booming = genuine participation? You need to break down this statement; otherwise, you'll suffer a huge loss.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 01-07 11:53
This theory sounds plausible, but to be honest, I've seen too many on-chain data projects that have been manipulated.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 01-07 11:52
Honestly, I was really hit by this. I had already fallen into the hype, and after social media blitz, there was not a single activity on the chain that earned a penny.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 01-07 11:45
The difference between social buzz and on-chain activity is so big. Why didn't I think of this? Next time, I need to take a good look at wallet data.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 01-07 11:40
Late at night, watching the gas tracker again, comparing the data... I knew it was doomed the moment social buzz skyrocketed.
Another information gap hunting ground, where are the wallet activities? I can't see any.
I've seen many failed attempts at grabbing profits, but what's truly terrifying are the on-chain illusions of false prosperity. How to judge them is the hardest part.
Three-layer verification sounds good, but in real operations, I often get caught in tricks. When Gwei surges, I still have to keep sweeping the floor.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-07 11:36
It's the same old spiel; I heard this back in 2018. Social buzz ≠ wallet transfers; you need real gold and silver to truly understand this principle.
Are 90% of the gains lost? Data illusion is the real culprit
High popularity ≠ project health, on-chain data ≠ absolute truth. As an on-chain researcher, my daily job is to expose these bubbles. Sharing my three-layer verification system, combined with two handy tools: on-chain behavior microscope and narrative heat radar.
The first layer is the most critical—comparing narrative heat to on-chain reality. For seemingly hot projects, what is the actual on-chain activity like? The gap is often huge. Divergence between social buzz and wallet activity is a warning sign of a failed pump. To avoid becoming a victim, you need to learn to spot this discrepancy at a glance.