On-Chain Data Analysis Platform Arkham Announces Removal of Support for Blast Blockchain from its Intel Platform on January 11th. This seemingly small technical decision actually reflects a re-evaluation of chain quality and user value within the current crypto ecosystem.
Evaluation Criteria Behind the Decision
Arkham explicitly states in its announcement that its decision to maintain chain integrations is based on two core factors:
Level of user demand
Importance of the chain to the crypto ecosystem
This means that whether a chain can continue to be supported on the Arkham platform depends on its ability to attract enough user attention and data query demand. While this standard appears simple, it directly targets the most genuine competition within the ecosystem — the choices of users and capital.
Why This Decision Is Worth Noticing
Arkham itself is a key infrastructure in the crypto ecosystem. According to the latest news, the platform is widely used for on-chain data monitoring, whale tracking, exchange fund flow analysis, and other scenarios. Losing support on such a widely used data analysis platform implies that:
Users can no longer query on-chain data for that chain via Arkham
The transparency and traceability of that chain will decrease
It becomes inconvenient for analysts and traders who want to conduct in-depth research on that chain
This is a clear signal for a blockchain that aims to attract institutional and professional users.
The Ecosystem’s Invisible Sorting
This decision reflects a phenomenon: not all blockchains in the crypto ecosystem receive equal support and attention. Infrastructure platforms like Arkham are essentially conducting an invisible ranking of chains within the ecosystem through “support or lack thereof.”
Chains that retain support typically have:
Higher user activity
More data query demand
A more important position within the ecosystem
Conversely, chains that lose support may need to reconsider their value positioning within the ecosystem.
Personal Opinion
While this decision is not good news for Blast, from the perspective of the entire ecosystem, this kind of “survival of the fittest” mechanism is actually healthy. It allows chains with genuine user demand and ecosystem value to gain more attention, while serving as a wake-up call for those underperforming. The key is how Blast responds — whether by improving user experience and ecosystem development to turn the situation around, or gradually becoming marginalized.
Summary
The decision by Arkham to remove support for Blast, though only a technical adjustment on one platform, reveals a deeper reality in the crypto ecosystem: resources and attention are increasingly concentrated on projects with real user demand and ecosystem value. For any blockchain project, gaining support from key infrastructure platforms like Arkham is crucial, and losing support warrants serious attention. The reactions and subsequent actions of the Blast ecosystem over the next four days are worth watching.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Arkham will soon remove Blast support, reflecting the ecological survival of the fittest
On-Chain Data Analysis Platform Arkham Announces Removal of Support for Blast Blockchain from its Intel Platform on January 11th. This seemingly small technical decision actually reflects a re-evaluation of chain quality and user value within the current crypto ecosystem.
Evaluation Criteria Behind the Decision
Arkham explicitly states in its announcement that its decision to maintain chain integrations is based on two core factors:
This means that whether a chain can continue to be supported on the Arkham platform depends on its ability to attract enough user attention and data query demand. While this standard appears simple, it directly targets the most genuine competition within the ecosystem — the choices of users and capital.
Why This Decision Is Worth Noticing
Arkham itself is a key infrastructure in the crypto ecosystem. According to the latest news, the platform is widely used for on-chain data monitoring, whale tracking, exchange fund flow analysis, and other scenarios. Losing support on such a widely used data analysis platform implies that:
This is a clear signal for a blockchain that aims to attract institutional and professional users.
The Ecosystem’s Invisible Sorting
This decision reflects a phenomenon: not all blockchains in the crypto ecosystem receive equal support and attention. Infrastructure platforms like Arkham are essentially conducting an invisible ranking of chains within the ecosystem through “support or lack thereof.”
Chains that retain support typically have:
Conversely, chains that lose support may need to reconsider their value positioning within the ecosystem.
Personal Opinion
While this decision is not good news for Blast, from the perspective of the entire ecosystem, this kind of “survival of the fittest” mechanism is actually healthy. It allows chains with genuine user demand and ecosystem value to gain more attention, while serving as a wake-up call for those underperforming. The key is how Blast responds — whether by improving user experience and ecosystem development to turn the situation around, or gradually becoming marginalized.
Summary
The decision by Arkham to remove support for Blast, though only a technical adjustment on one platform, reveals a deeper reality in the crypto ecosystem: resources and attention are increasingly concentrated on projects with real user demand and ecosystem value. For any blockchain project, gaining support from key infrastructure platforms like Arkham is crucial, and losing support warrants serious attention. The reactions and subsequent actions of the Blast ecosystem over the next four days are worth watching.