2026-01-08 14:26:58

The Web3 infrastructure track is crowded, with participants vying for attention. But some projects go against the trend and focus on deeper issues—alignment of incentives.

Wallchain's core logic is straightforward: make incentive mechanisms visible, traceable, and executable. This changes the rules of the game. Most ecosystem designs often rely on participants' conscious honesty or hope that coordination will naturally emerge. But in reality? That's often wishful thinking.

Rather than blindly trusting, it's better to hardcode the rules and make interests transparent. When every participant can see their reward and punishment mechanisms clearly, and when cooperation and cheating both have clear costs, the market can operate more efficiently. This is the power of incentive engineering.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NewPumpamentals

· 13m ago

Wow, finally someone is seriously working on incentive mechanisms, unlike other projects that just sell stories every day --- Making incentives transparent sounds simple, but few dare to change the rules. Wallchain is one of them --- Blind trust? That was in the last cycle. Now, interests must be fixed --- Alright, let's see if Wallchain can really implement the incentive project without it being just an empty dream --- Putting the reward and punishment mechanism on the table, both cooperation and cheating have costs. This logic makes sense

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 12h ago

I've already said it, most projects rely on faith to deceive people. Wallchain's approach is the right one. --- Alignment of incentives, in simple terms, is to prevent a few bad actors from ruining the whole system. Making the rules transparent naturally increases the cost of cheating. --- Currently, honest people in Web3 are at a disadvantage. We really need mechanisms like this, or else everyone gets taken to the cleaners. --- By sharing the benefits openly, no one can secretly exploit the system. This is the kind of ecosystem it should be. --- I support this approach, it’s a hundred times better than those who just hype up the market every day. --- Can the incentive mechanism be transparent and traceable? Isn’t that just putting shackles on cheaters? Not bad at all. --- Speaking of which, very few projects can truly lock down the rules; most are just talk on paper. --- Rely on self-discipline? In the crypto world? Ha, do you want to make me laugh to death? --- That’s what I call solving the problem, not some flashy marketing tricks.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 01-08 14:56

To be honest, the transparency of the incentive mechanism has indeed been seriously underestimated. Most projects are still relying on faith.

View OriginalReply0

DiamondHands

· 01-08 14:54

Damn, finally someone has explained this clearly. Most projects really just rely on a single phrase "community self-awareness" and call it a day, it's hilarious. Alignment of incentives is indeed the Achilles' heel of infrastructure. Wallchain's approach is pretty good; writing the benefit chain into code is more effective than anything else. It's another overhyped track, and there are very few who actually do the work. Transparent rules sound nice, but the problem is, who sets these rules? Isn't that still centralized? This is what I call pragmatic. Unlike some projects that talk about visions all day, incentive mechanisms are inherently a game. Everyone needs to know how to make it worthwhile.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 01-08 14:53

There really aren't many people working on incentive alignment; most are just hyping the ecosystem, but it's all just air... Wallchain's approach isn't bad; making the rules transparent is better than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 01-08 14:48

Reliable, finally someone has explained this clearly. Most projects are just making empty promises, but Wallchain's approach is surprisingly clear-headed. Transparency in rules is the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_not_broke

· 01-08 14:43

Ha, transparency in incentives is easy to talk about, but few projects can survive once actually implemented. --- It's another case of aligning incentives. Can Wallchain really make this happen? --- Trust through transparency is a logical approach, but I'm worried it will just turn into a data game in the end. --- Having fixed rules sounds great, but in the Web3 circle, today's rules are often changed tomorrow. --- Finally, someone has cut through the noise; it's much more reliable than those projects that just blow air. --- Making benefits transparent is good, but there are many ways to fake on-chain data. Can it truly prevent cheating? --- Incentive engineering is feasible, but only if participants actually pay attention to these things. 99% of people only care about how much they can earn. --- I just want to know if this incentive mechanism will be exploited again by certain big players.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 01-08 14:27

Honestly, most ecosystem designs are nonsense. What do they mean by "natural coordination"? On-chain data has long shown that when incentive mechanisms are vague, whales start accumulating tokens. The Wallchain approach indeed hits the nail on the head—transparency in rewards and punishments directly increases the cost of cheating, which is truly capable of changing the game rules. However, it still depends on execution; incentive alignment on paper often differs from actual fund flows.

View OriginalReply0