2026-01-08 14:27:09

Have you noticed that those still chasing meme coins might be missing the most critical opportunity of the year: traditional assets are flowing into blockchain.

What’s the problem? The technology has actually been solved long ago. The real bottleneck lies in an ancient contradiction—how to satisfy both privacy and compliance at the same time.

Imagine this scenario: a multinational company wants to issue bonds, allowing investors worldwide to participate, but the details of the financing and the investor list are confidential. In traditional finance, this is difficult; on existing public blockchains? Basically impossible. Only now has someone truly solved this problem.

Dusk’s core innovation is called "Confidential Smart Contracts." The core capability sounds complicated, but simply put: transaction contents are encrypted, but compliance status can be verified. To put it more plainly—regulators can confirm that you are conducting legitimate transactions without seeing the specific details. This delicate balance is exactly what all major institutions lack.

But having an idea isn’t enough. What truly impresses is their execution capability. This isn’t a project that just talks about concepts; they have already obtained exchange licenses and integrated with traditional financial infrastructure. In other words, real funds and real assets can now circulate on this network. This step may seem simple, but in reality, it marks a turning point in the entire game.

From the perspective of token economic design, it’s also quite interesting. DUSK needs to be staked to participate in compliance activities, needs to be held for governance voting, and needs to be consumed to pay for privacy computing costs. This multi-layered demand for usage, once the ecosystem truly takes off, will form a strong value support. Not just empty narratives, but real functional needs.

I understand—after getting used to meme coins that multiply a hundredfold, projects that emphasize "slow and meticulous work" may not excite adrenaline. But building financial infrastructure has never been a sprint; it’s a marathon. While most people are still staring at the finish line, the truly smart money is actually investing in those who are building the road.

The next bull market story may not be about whose chain is faster or who has higher TPS, but about who truly builds the bridge between the old and new worlds. In this competition, Dusk has at least already secured a real ticket to enter.

DUSK-14,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-11 11:59

Privacy + Compliance is indeed a good combination, but honestly, there are too few people entering now. When real big funds flow in, it might be too late. --- While everyone is hyping Dusk, I actually feel a bit anxious. The more "infrastructure" projects like this, the easier they are to be cut. Haven't we learned enough from history? --- To be honest, meme coins are really exciting, but your article makes me start to consider whether I should allocate some funds to infrastructure projects and weigh the risks. --- I believe in licenses + real capital flow, but I just don't know when we will see a true ecosystem explosion. --- Everyone understands that road builders make money, but the problem is surviving until that day. --- Alright, jumping from meme coins to Dusk does require some mental preparation, but the contradiction you mentioned between privacy and compliance is indeed a pain point. --- Staking, governance, and consumption all seem logically consistent, but I'm worried the ecosystem might not take off, then all efforts would be in vain. --- It feels like those talking about infrastructure now are reflecting on their quick wealth before, but when the bear market hits, who still cares about these things?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 01-11 11:48

Privacy + compliance has indeed been a balancing point that has stumped everyone for many years. Dusk seems to have truly figured it out this time. But honestly, I still need to see the trading volume to judge the execution. --- The road builders always earn more than those who just enjoy the scenery, no doubt about that. It’s just a matter of waiting for the ecosystem to really come alive. Maybe it’s still a bit early. --- Haha, it’s the "next Bitcoin" story again. Not denying that there’s a big demand for privacy, but the real question is, will people actually use it? Or will only institutions use it. --- Having a license is indeed impressive, showing it’s not just talk. But the biggest risk for such projects is policy changes. What do you think about this risk? --- A multi-layer demand model sounds good, but whether the token will fall into the old pattern of staking inflation depends on the operational level. --- Honestly, projects at this infrastructure level should be low-key like this. No need for constant marketing. Quality projects don’t need to shout every day.

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 01-08 14:57

Privacy + compliance is really a scarce balance point, but honestly, waiting until big funds actually enter the market is too late. --- Having a license is having a license, stop bragging. Real infrastructure is the true king. --- Playing meme coins ultimately is a zero-sum game. At least this kind of infrastructure is building something new. --- DUSK's staking demand is well-designed, but it still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly take off. There's too much air. --- People who build roads always earn more than those who strike gold. This saying also applies in crypto. --- Wait, if compliance status can be verified, does that mean regulators are really turning a blind eye, or is there another reason? --- Is tokenizing traditional assets really different this time? Feels like I've heard this argument for a long time. --- After looking at so many projects, those with execution ability are the ones with real chances, unlike some that boast every day.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-08 14:54

Privacy + compliance is indeed a brilliant point, but honestly, will big institutions really use it? That's the key. Traditional finance folks' trustworthiness is questionable; talking on paper is easy, but whether they can stay stable after going on-chain depends on real skill. Getting a license is just the first step; the real test comes afterward. Just looking at the multi-layered token design and demand can easily become an excuse to fleece investors; what's more important is the actual traffic in the ecosystem. These infrastructure projects are indeed boring, but profits often come from the most mundane places. When the bull market arrives, everything can rise; the key is whether you can survive until the next round.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 01-08 14:54

Privacy + compliance is indeed a powerful combination, but to be honest, I know very well how difficult it is to implement this stuff. Real infrastructure > a hundred times the narrative, I’ve truly realized this time. Wait, can you go deeper into the details of the licensing? Can you dig a bit more? This is the story I want, not just another vapor project. People who build roads always earn more than those who just run; it took me a long time to accept this reality.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 01-08 14:47

Hmm... Privacy + compliance satisfied at the same time? That really hits the pain points of institutions. But Bear still wants to see real data to speak, having a license alone is not enough(◍•ᴗ•◍)

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 01-08 14:39

Privacy + compliance is indeed a difficult balance, but it really counts only when it can truly connect to traditional financial infrastructure. --- Honestly, I'm already tired of meme coins; infrastructure-based projects are actually more solid. --- Staking, governance, multi-layered consumption needs... this is true tokenomics, not just hype. --- Licenses + real capital circulation, this step is indeed a game changer. Others are still in the conceptual stage. --- People who build the road always earn more than those who watch the finish line. That’s not wrong. --- Understood. The question is, when will the ecosystem truly take off... It’s still a bit early now. --- Privacy encryption and compliance verification—this delicate balance that major institutions lack has always been an issue.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 01-08 14:34

Privacy + compliance is indeed a real issue... but it depends on how far the execution can go in the end. --- Everyone is chasing meme doubling; infrastructure matters like this are indeed not as "fun," but logically they make sense. --- Big institutions have been waiting for something like this—a solution that can meet both privacy and compliance requirements. --- Have you obtained the exchange license? Then it’s no longer an air project; this is indeed a watershed moment. --- Staking + governance + consumption, token design still has substance, not just a routine to cut leeks. --- To put it simply, it’s a gamble on who can connect TradFi, and someone is seriously working on this. --- The marathon analogy is quite fitting, but the question is, how many can stick to the end? --- Will the cost of privacy computing become a bottleneck... what if operational costs rise? --- In the end, it still depends on whether the ecosystem can really take off; it’s too early to draw conclusions now.

View OriginalReply0