2026-01-08 14:27:47

Three months ago, a trader approached me with only $1,000 in capital. He repeatedly emphasized that this was his last chips; if he lost again, he would give up. I've seen this desperate mindset too many times—small players always want to turn things around with a big gamble, but in the end, they all become footnotes in the market.

I told him one thing: "The market is never short of gamblers; what it lacks are disciplined hunters. Hunters survive by systems, not luck."

Three months later, his account grew from $1,000 to $20,000, with zero liquidation throughout. There’s no complicated strategy—just sticking to three ironclad rules. Today, I share these practical insights with everyone.

**Ironclad Rule 1: Divide into three parts, refuse to go all-in**

The reason small funds quickly exit is 90% due to one-shot bets. I suggest dividing $1,000 into three parts, each with its own role:

The first part, $300, is for intraday short-term trading. Focus only on high-liquidity mainstream coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum, capturing 3%-5% intraday fluctuations, entering and exiting quickly, never holding overnight. The goal of this part is to keep the funds active at all times.

The second part, $300, waits for opportunity levels. Only act when clear trend signals appear—for example, when the price volume breaks through a key resistance level. Enter at this point, hold for 3 to 5 days, and aim for certain profits. This is the most stable part.

The third part, $400, is for life-saving funds. This money is untouchable, reserved for black swan events or mental adjustment after consecutive losses. Many people fail because they don’t leave this money intact—one mistake and everything collapses.

He said after a month: "I used to think that with little money, I had to go all-in. Now I realize that leaving a backup plan is the fastest way to move forward." Diversifying positions allows capturing opportunities while ensuring that a single mistake isn’t fatal. This is the core idea of classic risk management.

**Ironclad Rule 2: Follow the trend only, ignore noise**

The market spends 80% of its time oscillating, and frequent trading just adds fees to the trading platform. True hunter-style operation emphasizes:

Better to miss an opportunity than to make a mistake.

BTC0,27%

ETH0,51%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryingOldWallet

· 3h ago

1. 1000U multiplied by 20 times with zero liquidation? This three-part approach is indeed ruthless, it’s helped me survive much longer than when I was just blindly trading before. 2. The part about saving capital is spot on. I used to not leave this $400 buffer, and a black swan event would wipe me out instantly. 3. Better to miss out than to make mistakes. Honestly, it’s the art of patience; the hard part is just enduring. 4. Frequent trading in a volatile market really just burns through fees—I've fallen into this trap too many times. 5. Hunter vs. gambler, sounds simple but execution... really requires discipline. 6. I’ve tried short-term trading within 300 days, but the key is strict stop-loss; otherwise, it’s a free fall. 7. This guy made 20x in three months. If it weren’t for zero liquidation, I wouldn’t believe it. What about the details? 8. How to judge trend signals is a tough problem; everyone looks at different indicators. 9. Leaving a backup plan = giving yourself a chance to survive. Simple and straightforward but very practical. 10. I haven’t fully understood the opportunity levels. Holding for 3-5 days to ensure profit—how is that defined?

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 13h ago

Hey, this story sounds so familiar... I only later realized the importance of not going all-in. I feel like I am the lesson itself; I lost two months before understanding what risk management really means.

View OriginalReply0

ParanoiaKing

· 01-09 07:07

That's right, only restraint can lead to a longer life. I used to be a all-in gambling fanatic too, losing everything in one shot.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-08 14:57

1000U multiplied by 20 times? Listen, I've heard this phrase too many times, but zero liquidation is truly the ultimate. The key point remains—the rule of discipline > luck, I stand by that. --- The three-part allocation is brilliantly explained. I’ve been burned before on the safety net. Now I think leaving enough backup is much faster than going all-in, counterintuitive but true. --- It's better to miss out than to make mistakes. That’s the difference between winners and gamblers. Most people simply can’t do it. --- 20 times... Bro, your story is indeed convincing, just don’t know who will be the next . --- The three ironclad rules are basically: live to keep playing. If you die, even the best strategy is zero. --- Every time I see these kinds of shares, I think of those brothers who went all-in. Now, where are they? --- That safety net really hit me. I swept everything in before, now I understand what it means to "leave a way out for yourself." --- Trend trading vs. frequent operations, these two are not just different in fees, but also in mindset. I see through it.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-08 14:55

1. 1000U multiplied by 20 times? I just want to know if this guy can still hold on now, or will he be wiped out again in three months. 2. Sounds good, but can that 400U safety fund really hold? It's easy to talk about mindset. 3. Dividing into three parts sounds like showboating, but what if in practice all three parts want to go all-in? 4. Better to miss out than to make a mistake... Easy to say, but I ask you, when the real black swan comes, how will you avoid making mistakes? 5. 3-5% intraday—why do I feel it's easy to say but hard to do? Does the liquidity of mainstream coins really allow for such capturing? 6. The most heartbreaking thing is that "the market never lacks gamblers," that's me... but I’ve never actually set aside a 400U safety fund. 7. Trends are so intangible; can 200 K-line charts really reveal true trends? Feels like armchair generals after the fact. 8. I believe in 20x, but I just don't believe he can stay so calm explaining it a month later. If it were me, I’d be hyping it up already.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-08 14:54

Having a backup plan allows you to move faster, and this phrase hit home for me. Small funds must be disciplined.

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 01-08 14:50

Sounds good, but how many can actually implement a three-way distribution? Most people will still secretly leverage.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-08 14:30

1000U doubling twenty times, just listen and forget it. Those who can really survive are the ones who know how to leave a backup plan. I've seen too many all-in dreamers That's right, 80% of the time, volatility just costs transaction fees, don't die repeatedly by reckless trading. The difference between a hunter and a gambler is that simple The concept of a safety net is indeed crucial. Many people lose everything in a margin call because they lack this awareness. Who's to blame then? This logic sounds reasonable, but it depends on how many people can actually follow through. Most will still be tempted to go all-in The three-part allocation strategy sounds good, but the key is to find a clear trend signal. That's the real challenge

View OriginalReply0