I've seen too many people in the chat groups recently, with accounts only a few thousand dollars, yet they chase gains and cut losses every day as if they were on steroids. As a result, in less than two months, they've lost everything. It’s quite painful to watch. I’ve been through this phase myself and want to share some honest words.
In the crypto world, it’s essentially a numbers game. Claims like full positions with passion or risk control being just a formality are the fastest ways to fail. I’ve seen too many examples like this, and the ending is always the same.
I once mentored a beginner who started with only 1,200U. In four months, he grew it to 25,000, and now his account is close to 40,000. He never got liquidated during that time. This wasn’t luck or random guesses; it was based on a repeatable methodology. I started with 8,000U myself and used a similar approach to achieve financial freedom. This logic has been proven effective.
**Divide your money into three tiers; surviving is more important than making money**
Small capital first needs to focus not on making huge profits but on survival.
Here’s how I split the 1,200U: The first tier, 400U, is dedicated to intraday short-term trades. The rule is simple—close the position after one trade, take profits immediately, and don’t be greedy; the second tier, 400U, is for swing trading, only entering when the market is very clear; the remaining 400U is a safety net, and I wouldn’t touch it unless absolutely necessary. What’s the benefit of this division? Even if the first two tiers fail, there’s still a chance to bounce back.
Crypto markets are really volatile. I’ve seen too many people go all-in on a single position, only to be wiped out by a black swan event or a sudden plunge. So position management is fundamentally about risk control. The longer you survive, the more likely you are to make bigger gains.
**Most of the market time is just chatter; real opportunities only account for about 20%**
Crypto markets spend about 80% of the time sideways. Clear trending opportunities are rare—probably only 20%. My strategy is: during sideways periods, I do nothing and wait patiently. This requires strong patience, but sometimes doing nothing is the best strategy.
My personal rule is: as long as profits can still run, I don’t take profits. But once the trend becomes unclear and signals weaken, I close positions immediately. I’m not afraid of missing out on a trend; I’m afraid of wasting time on the wrong market conditions.
That’s why that partner was able to steadily grow from 1,200 to 40,000—it's not that he wins every time, but that he survives long enough to catch the real big opportunities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletManager
· 01-08 14:57
The three-tier position management system definitely has some value; it really tests human nature, as most people simply can't hold on.
Living is truly more important than anything else. I've seen too many people go all-in and then just quit the scene.
The 80/20 rule is correct; patience is required, and that's the hardest part of all.
Position management = risk management, I agree with that.
From 1200 to 40,000, the pace is a bit frighteningly steady. If it were me, I would have taken profits and exited early.
Waiting itself is the highest-level trading strategy, but unfortunately, most people can't endure it.
Using a multi-signature wallet for the main holdings and small positions for testing the waters—this logic makes sense.
No one can survive in front of a black swan, so always keep some bullets for a comeback.
Not taking profits can lead to missing out on major market moves, I’ve experienced this myself. The key is knowing when to exit.
Experience is valuable, but only if you survive long enough to accumulate it.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-08 14:46
Hey, that makes sense, but I still see too many people getting wrecked around me.
---
Not being greedy sounds simple, but actually doing it is really tough. I used to fall for this myself.
---
Damn, isn’t this exactly what I’m trying to figure out now? The three-tiered position sizing sounds super stable.
---
Living longer means earning more—that really hit me. I need to change my all-in habit.
---
Wait, is this real data or just theory? Why do I feel like the crypto market isn’t that predictable?
---
Honestly, I believe this logic, but the greed factor is just too hard to overcome, especially when others are doubling their investments.
---
To be honest, the biggest fear for small funds is going all-in once and then permanently exiting the market. This approach is indeed very stable.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 01-08 14:45
That's right, the key is to stay alive. Going all-in with a full position is just courting death.
The ones who go bankrupt are all greedy, I believe that.
Wait, $1200 in four months to $40,000? The data is so detailed, but it feels a bit suspicious.
But this tiered logic is indeed reliable; I'm just worried about losing composure during execution.
Most retail investors just can't sit still; 80% of them are in a sideways market but still insist on playing inside.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-08 14:44
Really, I'm already tired of the all-in strategy of going all in with full positions.
---
The idea of dividing into three tiers is pretty good, but most people simply can't sit still and always want to go all in for a gamble.
---
Wasting 80% of the time is too painful to hear. I was exhausted by this before.
---
Living longer means earning more. This phrase should be tattooed on your brain; it's more important than any technical analysis.
---
The key is patience. Being able to do nothing when chatting casually is really the hardest thing.
---
From 1200 to 40,000, it sounds great, but how many temptations must one resist in the middle?
---
You're right, but the problem is how many people can truly implement this logic? Most still panic and sell when excited.
---
Risk control sounds simple, but actually doing it is deadly. I've seen too many people get wiped out by a black swan event.
---
Not being greedy is easy to say, but how can you not be tempted when you see profits?
---
Damn, I am that kind of person who chases gains and sells on dips. Now I finally understand why I always lose.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 01-08 14:35
Damn, I've been using this three-part method for a while, just not so systematically.
You can only make money if you're alive; this saying needs to be ingrained in your mind.
How are the brothers who went all-in with full positions doing now? Still okay, haha.
Waiting for opportunities is more tiring than chasing the market, but it really works.
The story of turning 1200U into 40,000U sounds great, but ultimately, self-control is key.
I've seen too many people in the chat groups recently, with accounts only a few thousand dollars, yet they chase gains and cut losses every day as if they were on steroids. As a result, in less than two months, they've lost everything. It’s quite painful to watch. I’ve been through this phase myself and want to share some honest words.
In the crypto world, it’s essentially a numbers game. Claims like full positions with passion or risk control being just a formality are the fastest ways to fail. I’ve seen too many examples like this, and the ending is always the same.
I once mentored a beginner who started with only 1,200U. In four months, he grew it to 25,000, and now his account is close to 40,000. He never got liquidated during that time. This wasn’t luck or random guesses; it was based on a repeatable methodology. I started with 8,000U myself and used a similar approach to achieve financial freedom. This logic has been proven effective.
**Divide your money into three tiers; surviving is more important than making money**
Small capital first needs to focus not on making huge profits but on survival.
Here’s how I split the 1,200U: The first tier, 400U, is dedicated to intraday short-term trades. The rule is simple—close the position after one trade, take profits immediately, and don’t be greedy; the second tier, 400U, is for swing trading, only entering when the market is very clear; the remaining 400U is a safety net, and I wouldn’t touch it unless absolutely necessary. What’s the benefit of this division? Even if the first two tiers fail, there’s still a chance to bounce back.
Crypto markets are really volatile. I’ve seen too many people go all-in on a single position, only to be wiped out by a black swan event or a sudden plunge. So position management is fundamentally about risk control. The longer you survive, the more likely you are to make bigger gains.
**Most of the market time is just chatter; real opportunities only account for about 20%**
Crypto markets spend about 80% of the time sideways. Clear trending opportunities are rare—probably only 20%. My strategy is: during sideways periods, I do nothing and wait patiently. This requires strong patience, but sometimes doing nothing is the best strategy.
My personal rule is: as long as profits can still run, I don’t take profits. But once the trend becomes unclear and signals weaken, I close positions immediately. I’m not afraid of missing out on a trend; I’m afraid of wasting time on the wrong market conditions.
That’s why that partner was able to steadily grow from 1,200 to 40,000—it's not that he wins every time, but that he survives long enough to catch the real big opportunities.