2026-01-08 14:30:47

I recently gained a deeper understanding of the DUSK project and found that its approach is somewhat different. Instead of confronting regulation head-on, they choose to take proactive steps—their goal is to become the underlying infrastructure for compliant finance.

The core logic behind this is actually quite interesting: combining privacy technology with compliance frameworks to turn "privacy protection" and "regulatory requirements" from a binary choice into a compatible coexistence. It sounds simple, but the technical difficulty is not low.

Why is it worth paying attention to now? The background is very clear—RWA (Real-World Asset) tracks are booming, and institutional funds are pouring in large amounts. At this point in time, an infrastructure that can both protect user privacy and meet compliance requirements could become the key to a new wave of growth. DUSK’s narrative indeed has room for imagination.

DUSK8,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BasementAlchemist

· 5h ago

This approach does have some substance; the compatibility of privacy and compliance is indeed rare. Institutions currently accumulating RWA really need this kind of infrastructure, otherwise both project teams and institutions will be caught in the middle and feel uncomfortable. However, compliance frameworks vary from country to country, so how DUSK handles this part is still something to consider carefully. High technical difficulty is a good thing, as it creates barriers. The only concern is that it might ultimately become empty talk. Getting this direction right could really open up some imaginative possibilities.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 23h ago

Privacy + compliance is indeed a brilliant approach, solving the longstanding problem in Web3.

View OriginalReply0

BearWhisperGod

· 01-09 06:15

Privacy and compliance compatibility is indeed a different approach; it’s actually quite clever.

View OriginalReply0

NeonCollector

· 01-08 15:00

Can privacy and compliance be compatible? This logic is quite interesting, but it seems much harder to implement than to say. --- RWA is indeed fighting for territory. If DUSK can really open up this path, institutional money will definitely take a look. --- Honestly, my biggest concern is not the technical difficulty, but whether it can really be implemented or if it's just another story. --- Compliance infrastructure sounds sexy, but how long can it last? Regulations change faster than flipping through a book. --- Wait, does this logic mean that all those pure privacy projects in the past were heading in the wrong direction? --- Seriously, if this thing really works out, RWA will be the next liquidity battlefield. DUSK needs to seize the opportunity. --- The dilemma of choosing between privacy and compliance feels like many projects are stuck here.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-08 14:57

Privacy and compliance compatibility is easier said than done, and few can truly achieve it... DUSK's approach is indeed different. RWA is definitely attracting institutional players, but the prerequisite is that someone dares to take the first bite of the crab. Compliance infrastructure sounds sexy, but it depends on how well it is executed. It seems that ultimately, it still depends on who can first run through the commercial closed-loop. DUSK has a good idea, but I'm worried it's more of a concept than a product. Can privacy and regulation really be fully compatible? That's a bit of an overstatement... No matter how well the underlying infrastructure story is told, implementation is the key. The compliance route is indeed the right path, but the competition will be extremely fierce. DUSK has this potential, but it's too early to get off now.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-08 14:48

Honestly, can privacy and compliance truly coexist? I'm still a bit skeptical. This logic sounds great in theory, but let's see how it works in practice. Catching the RWA trend is indeed good timing, but I'm worried it might just be a concept ahead of its time.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 01-08 14:43

Compliance is definitely a smarter approach than blindly shouting about regulation. I do agree with the idea behind DUSK. I'm still a bit confused about how privacy + compliance are compatible and how the technical details are actually implemented. This wave of institutional RWA funding is really aggressive; it all depends on who can secure a position. It feels like another narrative game; let's wait and see how the market tests it. If this thing can truly handle both sides, then it's worth a shot.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-08 14:33

I agree with this logic. The combination of privacy + compliance is indeed rare. To be honest, the previous projects that stubbornly focused on regulation didn't have good results. The DUSK approach is truly clever. In this RWA wave, whoever can secure this position first will win. Wait, can their technology really handle such complex requirements? Or is it just PPT fundraising again... Good projects should be done this way. Instead of fighting, it's better to dance together. Have institutions entered? That's the real key.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 01-08 14:31

Can privacy and compliance coexist? This idea is indeed clear-headed; not fighting against regulations is the long-term way to survive.

View OriginalReply0