Web3 storage is becoming increasingly crowded, but what makes Walrus Protocol stand out in the SUI ecosystem? Let's break it down into three core aspects.



First, technology. Conventional decentralized storage solutions rely on simply duplicating data to ensure security through redundancy. Walrus uses erasure coding, splitting data into multiple fragments with added checksum verification, requiring only 4 to 5 times replication to achieve high availability. In other words, even if 2/3 of the nodes go offline, data can still be fully reconstructed. This approach directly cuts costs—storage expenses are kept around $50/TB/year. Filecoin is more than three times as expensive, and Arweave is even more costly, nearly 100 times higher. This is the first time decentralized storage prices have been brought to a level competitive with centralized cloud services.

Next, ecosystem stickiness. Walrus maps storage objects directly to on-chain assets, allowing developers to dynamically manage data through smart contracts. Need to modify NFT metadata? Cross-platform reuse of game equipment? All of this can be seamlessly integrated on SUI. This deep binding transforms storage from an isolated infrastructure into an integral part of the ecosystem, providing developers with a more flexible toolbox for building applications across the entire SUI chain.
SUI-0,36%
FIL-0,92%
AR-0,58%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationKingvip
· 6h ago
$50 per TB per year, this price really hits the mark. Finally, someone has made storage cheaper.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGasvip
· 14h ago
The erasure coding trick is indeed brilliant, and saving costs is real. But the biggest concern is what to do if a node actually goes down. Theoretically perfect doesn't always mean practically reliable.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-08 15:02
The erasure coding trick is indeed brilliant; reducing costs makes it immediately competitive. But to be fair, cheap also needs to be practical. The key is whether there are projects that actually use it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-08 14:59
The erasure coding trick is truly brilliant, reducing costs to one-tenth of Filecoin. Finally, someone has made decentralized storage prices look like a real thing.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYearsvip
· 01-08 14:59
The erasure coding strategy is indeed awesome, directly outperforming Filecoin and Arweave in cost. I feel like Walrus has something special.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 01-08 14:59
Erasure coding is indeed powerful, reducing costs to one-third of Filecoin's. That's the real affordable price for widespread adoption. However, the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly be utilized; otherwise, no matter how advanced the technology is, it would be pointless.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLongervip
· 01-08 14:57
Bro, $50 per T? I'll go all-in on SUI with full position. This is definitely the last wave. Faith recharged.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowrangervip
· 01-08 14:56
The erasure coding trick is indeed clever. Reducing costs is the key, and finally someone has made decentralized storage affordable enough to use.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt