Honestly, some people might not like this point of view: currently, a 20% return on USD1.0, for those who haven't yet engaged with a mainstream DeFi protocol, is not about slow reactions but perhaps a different understanding of the market.



Let me clarify the logic first—

The core reason I dare to participate in this arbitrage is that it occurs within the ecosystem chain of the leading exchanges themselves. It’s not some wild project offering high-interest bait.

The 20% return window on USD1.0, the USD1.0 borrowing entry point, and that mainstream DeFi protocol… all of these are systematically connected. Backed by top-tier institutions, supported by ecosystem incubation, this isn’t a grassroots scheme; it’s organized capital flow.

Why are the returns suddenly so high? Don’t naïvely think this is some kind of benefit. Frankly, it’s about ecosystem traffic.

The approach of leading exchanges has changed—no longer blindly throwing money around, but reserving the most lucrative APY for assets that can truly be absorbed within the “internal ecosystem.” And that DeFi protocol happens to be the key node for accepting these liquidity flows.

My own operations are actually quite simple, but most retail investors simply can’t think of it—

First, I didn’t buy USD1.0. That’s right, not a single one.

Second, I use the blue-chip assets I originally intended to hold long-term as a “cash machine.” BTC, ETH, BNB… I planned to hold these coins. Within the BNB Chain ecosystem, they can directly generate income streams…
USD10,01%
BTC0,15%
ETH0,91%
BNB-0,14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TaxEvadervip
· 13h ago
Wait, not buying USD1 actually earns 20%? I need to think this through again, it feels a bit confusing.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisservip
· 01-10 17:14
Oh wow, this tactic is indeed quite clever, but I still want to ask: is it really safe?
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 01-10 16:17
Damn, bro, I've seen through this trick a long time ago. It's just the exchange playing its own game.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10vip
· 01-08 15:06
Wake up, most people are really just eager to act on the 20% profit window without thinking about why exchanges are spending so much money themselves. Instead of buying USD1, they use blue-chip assets to hedge? That really is a twist of the mind. Here we go again, this kind of argument about "I’ve discovered a strategy others can't see" always sounds a bit mysterious. How long can the 20% profit window last? That’s the real question.
View OriginalReply0
Rekt_Recoveryvip
· 01-08 15:05
ngl this whole "dimension gap" take hits different after getting liquidated twice 🤡 but yeah the infrastructure play makes sense... just not falling for the 20% bait again, my leverage ptsd still fresh lol
Reply0
SmartContractPlumbervip
· 01-08 15:04
A 20% return sounds pretty attractive, but the key is whether the permission control of that liquidity pipeline has been truly audited. Endorsement by top exchanges does not mean the contract has no vulnerabilities; these two matters should be considered separately.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 01-08 15:01
Alright, this set of logic sounds straightforward, but only those with some guts would really dare to get on board. Not everyone can see this dimension.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 01-08 14:49
Well, this logic is indeed clear-headed. That's how I play it too—using existing blue-chip assets as income-generating assets to get it done.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt