#2026年比特币价格展望 Newcomers to contract trading often react with "go all-in"—the reasoning sounds plausible: "This way I can withstand volatility and look more stable."



It sounds reasonable, but here’s the hidden trap.

Going all-in is not your safety net. Let alone using it as an excuse for heavy leverage.

High leverage combined with an all-in position, when the market suddenly reverses, it’s not just a small loss—your account gets wiped out.

I’ve seen too many cases. One guy had $5,000 in his account, thought going all-in was safe, and used $4,000 to make a short-term trade. The market flickered, and he didn’t even have time to react—liquidated immediately.

The real purpose of going all-in is to give you room to operate, not a license to leverage heavily.

With the same 10x leverage, how big can the difference be?

Some only risk 10% of their position, cut losses when they’re wrong, and their account remains intact.

Others move 90% of their position up, leverage looks low on the surface, but a single market reversal can wipe them out entirely.

Look at some specific numbers:

An account with $1,000, using $100 to open a 50x position—if wrong, stop loss immediately, and the account stays healthy.

An account with $1,000, using $900 to open a 10x position—leverage appears low, but one reversal can completely wipe you out.

So the question isn’t "Is leverage safe?" but three honest questions you need to ask yourself:

How much of your total funds are you risking on this trade? (It’s recommended to stick to a 20% cap)

Have you set your stop-loss level? (Must do. Set it in advance. No negotiations.)

If the market reverses, can you handle the loss? (Limit single trade losses to within 3% of your total funds)

I also use the all-in mode now, but only with one strict rule: survive first, everything else comes second. Position management is the top priority. Think this through, and only then can trading be sustainable in the long run.
BTC3,78%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningSentryvip
· 01-11 06:17
Really, going all-in with this set of theories has trapped so many newbies, I'm honestly exhausted from seeing it.
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/vip
· 01-09 20:28
Full position is a trap, don't be fooled.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 01-08 15:07
Going all-in on that strategy, I've seen through it long ago. It's just a gambler's excuse.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOraclevip
· 01-08 15:07
Full position can't really save you; you still need to rely on stop-loss.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmivip
· 01-08 15:06
Bro, this case of 5000U really hits home. I have friends like that too. Full position is basically a trap. It looks safe but is actually a meat grinder. The key point is still that one sentence: staying alive is the most important. If you don't manage your position well, even low leverage is useless.
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmervip
· 01-08 15:01
It's the same old trick again. Going all-in won't save you at all; it will only make you die faster.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 01-08 14:47
Full position is a trap, beginners love to jump in. I've also fallen for it; a $4,000 move and it's gone.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)