This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MelonField
· 01-11 09:57
This buyback model sounds good, but how much can it actually generate? It depends on how much Superchain can earn.
It's nice to call it positive feedback, but the key is whether the ecosystem can really take off.
I've heard this logic many times before, and in the end, it all comes down to execution.
Another buyback and binding—feels like OP is "self-rescuing."
Let's see how this proposal turns out in six months; it's too early to draw conclusions now.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-11 09:10
Sounds good, but how long can the buyback last? I'm worried it will end in a failure again.
---
OP's recent move is quite interesting, finally thinking about token holders.
---
It sounds nice, but the key is how much Superchain can earn. Without revenue, everything is pointless.
---
Binding income to buybacks, the logic is sound, just afraid that the execution will go off track.
---
A 50% buyback sounds impressive, but is it just a pie in the sky?
---
Finally, there's a decent tokenomics design. Looking forward to real data later.
---
If this move is truly implemented, OP holders can indeed benefit.
---
Another beautiful vision, but market response is the real answer.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvester
· 01-10 06:17
50% buyback, sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be another empty promise
---
Whether this move can truly boost the market depends on whether Superchain's revenue can keep up
---
Anyway, I’ve bought a few OP at the bottom, just waiting for the ecosystem to thrive and drive the price up
---
It sounds nice, but executing it is another story
---
Feels a bit like a new trick to cut leeks? Or should we wait for market reactions before deciding
---
If this OP update really materializes, there might be a lot of FOMO
---
How much revenue can Superchain generate? It feels like the buyback strength might be overestimated
---
I like this approach of truly linking tokens with the ecosystem, but the premise is that revenue must really grow
---
Another solid proposal, the key is whether the execution can keep up
---
I've long believed in OP's long-term logic, and this gives me even more reason to hold
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGriller
· 01-08 15:28
Another buyback? Feels like this routine is a bit old now.
Constantly promoting ecosystem prosperity, but isn't it just to pump the market?
Whether it can actually be implemented is the key.
A 50% buyback sounds great, but Superchain needs to make money first.
Can this wave reverse OP's decline? It's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 01-08 15:28
Sounds good, but the key is whether it can really be executed properly.
---
50% buyback? Let’s see how much Superchain can earn first.
---
Token binding ecosystem benefits, I like this logic, but I’m worried it’s just talk on paper.
---
Wow, is this to truly let OP holders make money, or just another prelude to cutting the leeks?
---
Ecosystem prosperity = increased OP demand. The premise for this logic to hold is that Superchain can really scale up.
---
Wait, has it been implemented since February? Why is there no response?
---
Sounds good in theory, but execution might turn out differently.
---
I’ve seen many buyback tricks, the key is whether the market will buy it.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 01-08 15:11
50% buyback? Sounds good, but the key is whether you can make money. Can Superchain really take off?
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 01-08 15:09
Sounds good, but how much revenue can Superchain generate? It might just be another castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-08 15:06
Another buyback? This trick is old news; the key is how much Superchain can actually make.
---
A 50% buyback sounds good, but where's the real profit?
---
Binding supply and demand? That's a bit idealistic; the market is the real boss.
---
Sounds nice, but executing it is another matter...
---
Ecological prosperity → increased demand → OP price rise, the logic is sound, just worried it might turn out to be an empty promise.
---
This is telling us we still need to wait for Superchain's progress.
---
I just want to know how much daily income Superchain can currently generate. Anyone can talk big.
---
Anyway, let's see if it can really make money first.
Optimism提案:Superchain收入50%用于回购OP,代币与生态收益深度绑定
【区块律动】最近Optimism基金会抛出了个有意思的提案——把OP代币和Superchain的发展绑得更紧些。具体怎么做呢?从今年2月开始,Superchain产生的收入,有一半要拿来回购OP。
这个思路其实很直白:让代币持有者真正感受到生态成长的好处。Superchain赚得越多,回购力度就越大,反过来对代币价值也是个正反馈。换句话说,生态越繁荣,OP的需求量就越大,长期看对代币供需关系有推动作用。
不过这种政策落地还是要看执行。市场怎么看这个提案,后续能不能真正激活生态活力,都得时间来验证。