Looking across the entire crypto space, the truly good projects are few and far between—countable on one hand. If you filter strictly, there might be fewer than ten. If you go even harder, it’s probably hard to gather five. And the rest? Mostly zero-sum games.
What is a zero-sum game? To put it in a popular phrase: "You want to make my money, I want to make your money; it’s not about who cuts whom, it’s about mutual competition." In this environment, individuals might earn enough to improve their lives, but opportunities that can change generations and create real wealth? Rare to see.
In the long run, most people lose money in this fierce competition. Only professional traders can steadily earn some scattered profits—they rely on faster reactions, a tougher mindset, and a cooler head. Playing this game mostly involves consumption—watching K-line charts, digging through communities, guessing the intentions of big players, chasing hot trends—exhausting and unprofitable.
Here’s the interesting part: those truly valuable assets, besides Bitcoin, almost can’t establish a consensus among the masses. Ethereum, Solana, Binance Chain—no matter how excellent—they always face doubts and opposition. But Bitcoin is different. If ten years ago someone bought in at a fixed price and then did nothing, they’ve truly seen through the essence of the game—understood what real scarcity and truly irreplaceable consensus mean.
Looking at those who, ten years ago, studied Bitcoin’s daily charts every day, analyzing golden crosses, death crosses, Bollinger Bands, MACD, KDj, Fibonacci retracements—retrospectively, they missed the point. Those technical details, in the end, are useless. Holding long-term those truly valuable assets is what shows you’ve really understood this game.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xInsomnia
· 01-11 12:45
Honestly, most people are just stepping stones for professional players.
Ten years ago, those who quietly bought Bitcoin truly made a fortune. What about us fools who watch K-lines every day?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 01-09 20:33
That's a really harsh statement, but to be honest, most people are just providing liquidity for others' chips.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSeller
· 01-08 15:50
It's really hitting home. Ten years ago, I was that fool who watched MACD every day. Looking back now, it was truly a waste of life.
Now I understand that besides BTC, everything else is just playing around and can't make big money.
Speaking of which, it seems most people are just cannon fodder... Only professional players can survive, so there's no need for us to keep messing around.
The zero-sum game in the crypto world never ends. When will we finally encounter a real opportunity?
Honestly, if I had known ten years ago, I would have held long-term and not bothered with these illusions.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 01-08 15:50
That's harsh, but it really hits home. I'm one of those fools glued to the charts all day—exhausted and still losing money, haha.
If I'd bought Bitcoin ten years ago and just left it alone, that would've been true wisdom. We technical analysts are just researching MACD and all that nonsense, pure self-deception.
Good projects are genuinely scarce—you can't even find five decent ones. That sounds way too hollow, like someone's trying to sell me a dream.
Bitcoin's consensus really is unbeatable. Everything else, no matter how strong, still has to watch the whales' faces. No argument there.
I believe that most people lose money because I'm part of that majority—lessons learned in blood.
Professional traders succeed through mindset and reaction time? Sounds easy, but regular people can't learn it. It's just a probability game.
Instead of obsessing over technical indicators and details, might as well buy solid assets and go to sleep. I finally get it now.
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 01-08 15:50
That really hits home. The group that quietly bought Bitcoin ten years ago indeed won, while people like us who watch the charts every day? We're just working for the exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagic
· 01-08 15:46
That hits too close to home, it's exactly how I looked ten years ago... Now I can only watch helplessly as those who lie flat make big money.
Looking across the entire crypto space, the truly good projects are few and far between—countable on one hand. If you filter strictly, there might be fewer than ten. If you go even harder, it’s probably hard to gather five. And the rest? Mostly zero-sum games.
What is a zero-sum game? To put it in a popular phrase: "You want to make my money, I want to make your money; it’s not about who cuts whom, it’s about mutual competition." In this environment, individuals might earn enough to improve their lives, but opportunities that can change generations and create real wealth? Rare to see.
In the long run, most people lose money in this fierce competition. Only professional traders can steadily earn some scattered profits—they rely on faster reactions, a tougher mindset, and a cooler head. Playing this game mostly involves consumption—watching K-line charts, digging through communities, guessing the intentions of big players, chasing hot trends—exhausting and unprofitable.
Here’s the interesting part: those truly valuable assets, besides Bitcoin, almost can’t establish a consensus among the masses. Ethereum, Solana, Binance Chain—no matter how excellent—they always face doubts and opposition. But Bitcoin is different. If ten years ago someone bought in at a fixed price and then did nothing, they’ve truly seen through the essence of the game—understood what real scarcity and truly irreplaceable consensus mean.
Looking at those who, ten years ago, studied Bitcoin’s daily charts every day, analyzing golden crosses, death crosses, Bollinger Bands, MACD, KDj, Fibonacci retracements—retrospectively, they missed the point. Those technical details, in the end, are useless. Holding long-term those truly valuable assets is what shows you’ve really understood this game.