Hear me out on this one:



Getting from $100k to $1m might actually be less of a grind than bootstrapping your way from zero to that first $10k.

Think about it—early stage capital is brutal. You're fighting against compound interest working against you, limited options, and pure capital constraints. Every move matters because the absolute numbers are so small.

Once you hit six figures though? You've got leverage. Better opportunities start showing up. Risk management becomes viable instead of theoretical.

Of course, psychology shifts at every level too. The 10x might look the same on paper, but the journey feels totally different.

What's your take? Does this match what you've seen in the space?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
blockBoyvip
· 01-11 12:22
Nah, I don't really buy into that logic. The real test of character is only from 0 to 10k, okay?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 01-08 15:38
Tsk, this logic makes some sense. Going from 0 to 10,000 is truly hell on earth, every penny must be carefully calculated. But once it reaches 100k and above, it's definitely like cheating.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMomvip
· 01-08 15:32
Wow, I have to say I agree with this point. In the early days, it was really about grinding it out, making every penny count.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-08 15:30
NGL, this point has some merit... In the early stages, it was indeed frustrating, and it's common to get mentally overwhelmed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)