Many seasoned crypto traders have fallen into this trap—trying to buy in at low prices by using the collateralized borrowing feature on a major CEX, staking BNB to borrow USDT. It sounds pretty convenient—no need to transfer tokens on-chain, just a few clicks.
I used to do the same until one day out of boredom, I compared the borrowing costs in DeFi. After reviewing the data, I almost fell off my chair.
**The Truth on the Bill**
The borrowing scheme on a major CEX: the annualized interest rate for USDT is variable. When the market slightly improves and more people borrow U, the rate immediately jumps to 8%-15%, or even more outrageous figures. Plus, interest is calculated hourly, with compound interest.
On the DeFi side? Using slisBNB to borrow USD1 is a completely different world. First, slisBNB itself yields about 3% node rewards. Second, the annualized borrowing interest for USD1 stays around 1%-2%. Finally, USD1 and USDT are almost exchangeable at parity, with virtually no slippage.
**Breaking Down the Ledger**
Borrow U on a major CEX: not only do you not get the staking rewards for BNB, but you also pay nearly 10% interest, pushing the total cost up to 13%. Borrow U in DeFi: earn 3% income, pay 1% interest, resulting in a net +2% gain.
With one in and one out, the annualized return is artificially stretched by 15 percentage points!
Here's a concrete example: if you borrow 10,000 U, over a year, this difference amounts to 1,500 U. Think about what you could do with that money?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 01-11 09:17
Wow, this price difference is really outrageous. I was also the big fool borrowing U on CEX before, and hearing you say that makes me feel like I lost a lot.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 01-11 06:17
ngl this 15bps spread arbitrage is basically free money if you actually run the numbers. CEX fees truly are unhinged.
Reply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-08 15:32
Wow, giving away 1500U to CEX for free in just a year? I used to play like that too, what a loss.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 01-08 15:24
Damn, why didn't I do the math earlier and avoid giving away so much US to the exchange...
Many seasoned crypto traders have fallen into this trap—trying to buy in at low prices by using the collateralized borrowing feature on a major CEX, staking BNB to borrow USDT. It sounds pretty convenient—no need to transfer tokens on-chain, just a few clicks.
I used to do the same until one day out of boredom, I compared the borrowing costs in DeFi. After reviewing the data, I almost fell off my chair.
**The Truth on the Bill**
The borrowing scheme on a major CEX: the annualized interest rate for USDT is variable. When the market slightly improves and more people borrow U, the rate immediately jumps to 8%-15%, or even more outrageous figures. Plus, interest is calculated hourly, with compound interest.
On the DeFi side? Using slisBNB to borrow USD1 is a completely different world. First, slisBNB itself yields about 3% node rewards. Second, the annualized borrowing interest for USD1 stays around 1%-2%. Finally, USD1 and USDT are almost exchangeable at parity, with virtually no slippage.
**Breaking Down the Ledger**
Borrow U on a major CEX: not only do you not get the staking rewards for BNB, but you also pay nearly 10% interest, pushing the total cost up to 13%. Borrow U in DeFi: earn 3% income, pay 1% interest, resulting in a net +2% gain.
With one in and one out, the annualized return is artificially stretched by 15 percentage points!
Here's a concrete example: if you borrow 10,000 U, over a year, this difference amounts to 1,500 U. Think about what you could do with that money?