2026-01-08 15:23:03

The risk issues of a major trading platform have recently sparked much discussion. Cases of user funds being frozen happen from time to time — the key point here is that when the platform treats user funds as its own assets, the so-called "account freezing" becomes very delicate. Freezing its own money is completely different in nature from freezing user assets. That is the core problem: the foundation of user trust has been shaken. Behind seemingly professional operations, is there truly a sincere effort to protect every user's funds? This warrants deep reflection.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 01-11 12:39

Basically, the platform misappropriated the funds and then blamed risk control.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-10 18:36

This is what I was talking about. In their eyes, users' money has long ceased to be users' money. The platform mixes its own funds with user assets, and in the end, retail investors are always the ones who suffer. Freezing accounts is very normal; they freeze accounts whenever they say so and unfreeze whenever they say so. Another trust crisis. How many people will continue to use these leading platforms? It may seem professional, but it's really just brainwashing. I truly feel sorry for those users whose accounts have been frozen.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-08 15:49

Coming with this again? I've seen through it long ago. The platform treats your money as their own spending, it's really outrageous. This operation is truly tempting my principal. Freezing user assets is called risk control; freezing your own money is called scheduling. Double standards at its best. Trust is something that can be destroyed in just one instance. Talking about professional operation, it's obviously just trying to embezzle. So obvious. Always like this, the biggest platforms are the best at playing word games. With no control over funds, what decentralization are you talking about? Laughable.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-08 15:38

Basically, the platform is using our money as if it were their own, it's really outrageous. This trick is so familiar, with a bunch of reasons for freezing, but anyway, you can't get your money back. Trust? It's long gone, who would still dare to put money in there? Misappropriation under the guise of compliance, just sounds disgusting. It's the same old story, when will we finally settle accounts with these people?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-08 15:32

At first I still believed in them, now I just laugh. Freezing my own money or freezing my money, what’s the difference? Wake up, everyone. Another "professional operation" disguise, their pants are falling off. Fund safety? Ha, that word sounds ironic now. The platform treats our money as if it were their own, and still dares to talk about risk control? I'm not kidding, who still dares to put large amounts on these platforms now. Trust is something that, once broken, is broken forever and cannot be glued back.

View OriginalReply0