2026-01-08 15:24:13

The robotics track has indeed been extremely popular in the past two years. Companies like Figure AI and 1X have promising prospects, but the problem is—these top-tier projects have very high investment thresholds. Most of the time, ordinary investors simply don't have the chance to get in, as the market is dominated by institutions and large financial groups.

XMAQUINA DAO has changed this situation. Essentially, it's a crowdfunding model— a group of people pooling their money to invest together, diversifying risk, and sharing the profits. You don't need to be a millionaire or have a deep background to participate in the growth stories of these star companies.

What's interesting about this model is that it breaks down the class barriers in investing. Previously, only venture capitalists could access early-stage projects, but now ordinary people can also get a share. Of course, all investments carry risks, but at least it gives us the right to choose—which is inherently very valuable.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-9ad11037

· 22h ago

Crowdfunding investment robot track? Sounds good, but still need to be cautious. --- Another story that breaks class barriers, is it real or fake? --- I get the logic of XMAQUINA, it's just afraid of retail investors ending up as bagholders. --- Institutional monopoly is indeed annoying, this time finally there's a chance to get on the table. --- Risk sharing and profit sharing, the ideal is very beautiful. --- Ordinary people can also play early-stage projects? I want to see how much this wave can earn. --- Crowdfunding mode is not new, the key is how to exit afterward. --- It sounds like democratized investment, but I want to see a bit more before making a decision. --- Giving opportunities is a good thing, just afraid that after giving the opportunity, losses will follow. --- Figure AI and these projects are indeed attractive, but unfortunately, the threshold is high for us.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeBeggar

· 01-08 15:50

Uh... crowdfunding investment robots? Sounds like another new trick to cut leeks. Can this DAO really break down class barriers? I only see new risks transferred to retail investors. How did this kind of packaging usually end up a few years ago? Just thinking about it gives me a headache. By the way, why don't venture capitalists touch this stuff, but instead let us ordinary people do it? This is a bit shady. But if it can really diversify risks, it's worth a try. The key is to read the terms carefully. Figure AI is indeed impressive, but can participating in crowdfunding really bring benefits? Still skeptical. Instead of handing it over to a DAO, it's more reliable to choose your own track, I think. This kind of democratized investment sounds great, but in practice, isn't it just exploited by certain people? Come on, the phrase "all investments carry risks" is not just some motivational speech. There are many pitfalls involved.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-08 15:42

Crowdfunding investment in the robot racing track, sounds good but can it really make money? How long can this DAO system last? Institutions have been cutting for so many years, now they want retail investors to take over? Early-stage projects are so risky, crowdfunding is even more dangerous. Breaking down class barriers? Mainly just changing the way to harvest profits. What happened to DAO projects from the past two years? Has anyone been tracking them? It just feels like spreading the high risk to more people.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainBreather

· 01-08 15:24

Crowdfunding investment sounds great, but can you really make money? Wait, isn't this just a disguised Ponzi scheme? The robot track is indeed popular, but I still have some doubts about the DAO model. Lowering the threshold actually increases the risk... A group of retail investors pooling money to play top-tier projects? I find it hard to believe this logic. Breaking down class barriers? Let's see how they cut the leeks first. Diversifying risk sounds good, but it's really just gambling together. This model still seems a bit suspicious, better to be cautious. Pooling money to invest sounds good, but who guarantees the returns?

View OriginalReply0