Market opportunities often emerge from information gaps. Take $EPIC—it's backed by a major fintech institution and stands out as a rare mainstream exchange listing with serious RWA (Real World Asset) focus. While the broader market hasn't fully priced in what this positioning means, the project itself is engineered specifically for tokenizing real-world assets. Meanwhile, $COLLECT (through its ecosystem partner) is also carving out its own space, though details remain limited. The key here isn't hype—it's understanding why certain projects get institutional backing and what that signal tells us about where the narrative might head next.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkInTheRoad
· 9m ago
RWA narratives haven't gained traction yet, and they're already selling stories. When institutions actually start entering in large numbers someday, that will be the real signal.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 9m ago
Institutional endorsement is really no small matter; EPIC's recent move is quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter
· 12h ago
Bro, I always feel like there's a lot of hype behind this institution's endorsement. Can $EPIC really take off?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 01-08 15:55
ngl the institutional signal here is the real alpha, not the tokenomics thread everyone's gonna spam tomorrow. $EPIC's positioning screams "we know something about RWA infrastructure scaling that retail hasn't priced in yet"—classic information asymmetry play. wondering what the actual basis points look like on settlement though...
Reply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-08 15:52
Institutional endorsements do have a way, but talking about information asymmetry is too vague; right now, anyone can hype the RWA concept.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-08 15:30
Institutional endorsement is indeed a signal, but can $EPIC truly enable RWA to break through the narrative ceiling... or is it just another concept hype?
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 01-08 15:30
Institutional endorsement is really a skill, and EPIC's RWA layout is indeed quite interesting. It's a pity that most people haven't realized it yet.
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 01-08 15:28
Institution-backed projects are indeed worth a closer look, but information asymmetry is always a double-edged sword.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-08 15:26
Institutional endorsement is really that shining light, but the market hasn't reacted yet.
Market opportunities often emerge from information gaps. Take $EPIC—it's backed by a major fintech institution and stands out as a rare mainstream exchange listing with serious RWA (Real World Asset) focus. While the broader market hasn't fully priced in what this positioning means, the project itself is engineered specifically for tokenizing real-world assets. Meanwhile, $COLLECT (through its ecosystem partner) is also carving out its own space, though details remain limited. The key here isn't hype—it's understanding why certain projects get institutional backing and what that signal tells us about where the narrative might head next.