Walrus's token economic model contains many details. Looking at the distribution of the total supply of 5 billion tokens: the community and ecosystem account for the majority, reaching 55.56%, but within this, airdrops and various incentives are basically unlocked linearly. Although the core team and investors only hold 27.78%, their tokens are locked for 3 to 4 years—this design actually aims to prevent one thing: avoiding a flood of tokens hitting the market in the short term. The deeper logic is to synchronize the release rate of token circulation with the actual usage and node growth of the network.
The question boils down to this: the next 12 to 24 months are an observation window. As testnet incentives are completed, the mainnet is gradually launched, and the demand for node staking increases, whether the newly released tokens can be absorbed by real purchasing power and staking demand from applications will be the key to determining Walrus's price trend. Simply put, even if the token supply is reasonable, without enough application ecosystem and node participation to absorb it, liquidity pressure will eventually surface. During this period, the progress of ecosystem development and the maturity of mainnet functions almost determine whether the tokens can be released smoothly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHobo
· 01-11 11:47
Speaking of which, locking the team for 3-4 years is indeed a tough move, but the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up; otherwise, just having a reasonable release schedule is of little use.
The real test will be in the next two years—whether the testnet is complete and whether nodes can be activated are all unknowns.
A supply of 5 billion tokens seems quite balanced, but I still doubt whether it can truly absorb that many newly released tokens in the short term.
Instead of studying token models, it's better to focus on what real applications Walrus currently has—talking about perfect designs is pointless.
The long lock-up period suggests that even the team doesn't really believe there will be a short-term explosion, haha.
The core issue is whether the purchasing power on the application side can keep pace with the release speed—that's the true litmus test for whether it will really take off.
During the period of mainnet launch, whoever moves faster in their ecosystem will win. I favor those projects that have already laid out early.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 01-11 03:36
The real test is whether the ecosystem can keep up. The biggest fear with air coins is that token release outpaces application development.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 01-08 15:55
Speaking of which, this locking logic really managed to prevent a wave of retail investors from being slaughtered.
Can it withstand 12 to 24 months? It mainly depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up with the release speed.
The team's strategy is pretty good; at least it's not a tactic of dumping the market right from the start.
But in the end, it still depends on how many new tokens the nodes and applications can absorb—that's the real challenge.
No matter how well the supply is designed, there must be genuine demand to support it.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorker
· 01-08 15:39
The team locking for 3-4 years is indeed a tough move, but ultimately it still depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up. Otherwise, no matter how good the model is, it's all in vain.
If the ecosystem doesn't develop, no matter how linearly the tokens are released, they will still dump. The next 12 months are the real test period.
Don't just look at the supply distribution; the key is how much of the new tokens the application ecosystem can absorb. That's the real hard indicator.
If staking demand doesn't pick up, everything is just talk on paper.
No matter how good the hype, without real node participation and application demand, the price will still fall.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicorn
· 01-08 15:37
Oh no, it's that old trick of "token lock-up to prevent dumping" again. The key still depends on whether the ecosystem can hold up.
Walrus's token economic model contains many details. Looking at the distribution of the total supply of 5 billion tokens: the community and ecosystem account for the majority, reaching 55.56%, but within this, airdrops and various incentives are basically unlocked linearly. Although the core team and investors only hold 27.78%, their tokens are locked for 3 to 4 years—this design actually aims to prevent one thing: avoiding a flood of tokens hitting the market in the short term. The deeper logic is to synchronize the release rate of token circulation with the actual usage and node growth of the network.
The question boils down to this: the next 12 to 24 months are an observation window. As testnet incentives are completed, the mainnet is gradually launched, and the demand for node staking increases, whether the newly released tokens can be absorbed by real purchasing power and staking demand from applications will be the key to determining Walrus's price trend. Simply put, even if the token supply is reasonable, without enough application ecosystem and node participation to absorb it, liquidity pressure will eventually surface. During this period, the progress of ecosystem development and the maturity of mainnet functions almost determine whether the tokens can be released smoothly.